Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lyle and Janis Berman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$72kReligion$54kPhilanthropy$25kInternational$9kEnvironment$6kCivil Rights$4kHealth$2kArts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$324k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESOLVE INC$5,500
MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
ADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATION$5,000
B'NAI B'RITH$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 10 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$149k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    ADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $52k
  • SH
    SHOLOM HOME CARE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k
  • MJ
    MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue -1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +54%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Jewish Community Relations Council

The jewish community relations council (jcrc) works within the jewish and broader communities in st. louis to enhance cooperation with other religious, racial, ethnic and civic groups; foster a just, democratic and pluralistic society; and…

Community Improvement
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
9
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
10
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
11
Jewish Council for Public Affairs Inc

The mission of the jewish council for public affairs (jcpa) is to strengthen and leverage the jewish community relations network across the nation to champion a just, democratic and pluralistic society and advance the right of full…

—
12
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Pottery Museum Red Wing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATION: $51,527 · OtherADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATIONSHOLOM HOME CARE: $50,000 · OtherSHOLOM HOME CAREMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientB NAI B RITH: $7,000 · Other+5 more: $6,350 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS JEW…CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANC…RESOLVE INC: $5,500 · AnimalsJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $4,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $3,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $2,000 · InternationalPOTTERY MUSEUM RED WING INC: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$152,377Philanthropy$26,500Animals$5,500Human Services$4,000Civil Rights$3,000International$2,000Arts & Culture$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetB NAI B RITH: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRESOLVE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOTTERY MUSEUM RED WING INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds POTTERY MUSEUM RED WING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH12.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lyle and Janis Berman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lyle and Janis Berman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lyle and Janis Berman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lyle and Janis Berman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lyle and Janis Berman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph