· Private foundation
The Lundrigan Walker Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA | $5,000 |
| NEVADA NORDIC | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE INC | $5,000 |
| SIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $5,000 |
| ACHIEVE TAHOE | $5,000 |
| THE ALS ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,000 |
| VASCULITIS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS | $2,000 |
| AUTOIMMUNE ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +20%- TFTAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +289%
- NNNevada Nordic4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +342%
Funded once
- CFCALDOR FIRE FUNDone grant, 2021 · $10k
- TTTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION HOUSING SOLUTIONS FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
- HSHOUSING SOLUTIONS FUNDone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
The redwood trails alliance is an advocate for our diverse community of trail users. we teach responsible trail stewardship and offer volunteer trail work opportunities along with planning and construction services for trails for all to…
The truckee river watershed council was founded to implement locally developed public-private collaborative solutions to protect and improve water quality and biological resources for the sustainable environmental and economic health of…
The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.
To protect and restore the ecosystem of the southern sierra nevada - including both the sequoia national forest and the giant sequoia monument - through monitoring, enforcement, litigation, and public awareness.by acting as the eyes, ears,…
To plan, steward, interpret, promote, and sustain a system of four-season trails and public access to natural areas in the Mammoth Lakes and Eastern Sierra Nevada region in the state of California while protecting its natural resources.
Creation and maintenance of a "connected community" by promoting and facilitating trails & pathways programs.
To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…
A membership organization dedicated to developing, promoting, and serving your business and community. Our goal is to sustain a high quality of life by achieving economic vitality, with sensitivity and respect for the environment.
The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Fund and the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nevada Nordic ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sierra State Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFFS SEARCH & RESCUE I ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds TAHOE INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
- Who funds SIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP ↗
- Who funds VASCULITIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Truckee Trails Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Truckee Dirt Union ↗
- Who funds TAHOE NORDIC SEARCH & RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Rim Trail Association ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Area Mountain Biking Association ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Tahoe Fund · Tahoe Community Foundation · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · The Corrigan-Walla Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Tahoe Mountain Resorts Environmental Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Gates Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lundrigan Walker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.