Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lundrigan Walker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$122kEnvironment$93kRecreation & Sports$91kInternational$65kCivil Rights$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kAnimals$30kHousing & Shelter$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$5,000
NEVADA NORDIC$5,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$5,000
LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE INC$5,000
SIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP$5,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$5,000
ACHIEVE TAHOE$5,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION$5,000
HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
VASCULITIS FOUNDATION$2,000
ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$2,000
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS$2,000
AUTOIMMUNE ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SIGHTSAVERS INC: $5k → 16%BIKING FOR A BETTER WORLD: $5k → 6%KEEP TAHOE BLUE: $5k → 8%SHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE INC: $5k → 9%OASIS: $10k → 10%ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CA: $10k → 10%TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%SIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP: $5k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THE BALAM FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%UN REFUGEE AGENCY (USA FOR UNHCR): $10k → 14%AUTOIMMUNE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $10k → 8%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 7%TAHOE RIM TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%NEVADA NORDIC: $10k → 10%TAHOE NORDIC SAR: $10k → 6%CALDOR FIRE FUND: $10k → 8%OASIS: $5k → 10%ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION HOUSING SOLUTIONS FUND: $10k → 11%SIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP: $5k → 13%HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%UN REFUGEE AGENCY (USA FOR UNHCR): $10k → 14%NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $10k → 8%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 7%NEVADA NORDIC: $5k → 10%TAHOE FUND EAST SHORE TRAIL: $5k → 6%ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10k → 10%ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%WOLRD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10k → 14%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 7%NEVADA NORDIC: $5k → 10%LAKE TAHOE SNOWMOBILERS: $5k → 6%ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10k → 10%TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S SEARCH AND RESCUE: $10k → 11%ACLU FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ACLU FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$498k · 32 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
13

Total granted

$498k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +20%
  • TF
    TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +289%
  • NN
    Nevada Nordic
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +342%

Funded once

  • CF
    CALDOR FIRE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TT
    TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION HOUSING SOLUTIONS FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HS
    HOUSING SOLUTIONS FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
2
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
3
Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance

At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.

4
Redwood Trails Alliance

The redwood trails alliance is an advocate for our diverse community of trail users. we teach responsible trail stewardship and offer volunteer trail work opportunities along with planning and construction services for trails for all to…

5
Truckee River Watershed Council

The truckee river watershed council was founded to implement locally developed public-private collaborative solutions to protect and improve water quality and biological resources for the sustainable environmental and economic health of…

Environment
6
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
7
Sequoia Forestkeeper

To protect and restore the ecosystem of the southern sierra nevada - including both the sequoia national forest and the giant sequoia monument - through monitoring, enforcement, litigation, and public awareness.by acting as the eyes, ears,…

Environment
8
Mltpa Foundation

To plan, steward, interpret, promote, and sustain a system of four-season trails and public access to natural areas in the Mammoth Lakes and Eastern Sierra Nevada region in the state of California while protecting its natural resources.

Environment
9
Teton Valley Trails & Pathways Incorporated

Creation and maintenance of a "connected community" by promoting and facilitating trails & pathways programs.

Environment
10
Sierra Nevada Alliance

To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…

Environment
11
Lake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce

A membership organization dedicated to developing, promoting, and serving your business and community. Our goal is to sustain a high quality of life by achieving economic vitality, with sensitivity and respect for the environment.

12
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Fund and the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Volunteer Fire DepartmentsCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%32%35–55yr13%17%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,942

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $24,000 · OtherACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICEACHIEVE TAHOE — $20,000 · OtherACHIEVE TAHOEAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN…UN REFUGEE AGENCY (USA FOR UNHCR) — $20,000 · OtherUN REFUGEE AGENCY (USA FOR UNHCR)Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc — $15,000 · OtherOASIS — $15,000 · OtherCALDOR FIRE FUND — $10,000 · OtherTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION HOUSING SOLUTIONS FUND — $10,000 · OtherHOUSING SOLUTIONS FUND — $10,000 · OtherSOUTH LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CENTER — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherTHE ALS ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+10 more — $54,000 · Other+10 moreNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $24,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK…TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $15,000 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONNER L…TAHOE INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL SCIENCE — $15,000 · EnvironmentTAHOE INSTITUTE …TAHOE FUND — $10,000 · EnvironmentTAHOE FUNDSIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP — $10,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA BUTTES TR…Truckee Trails Foundation Inc — $9,000 · EnvironmentTruckee Trails F…Truckee Dirt Union — $7,000 · EnvironmentTruckee Dirt Uni…TAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthTAHOE FOREST H…NAMI National — $15,000 · HealthNAMI NationalHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthHEARING HEALTH…AMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION — $9,000 · HealthAMERICAN AUTOI…National Kidney Foundation Inc — $5,000 · HealthNational Kidne…SIGHTSAVERS INC — $5,000 · HealthSIGHTSAVERS IN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $4,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…BIKING FOR A BETTER WORLD INC — $5,000 · InternationalBIKING FOR …Nevada Nordic — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsNevada No…Sierra State Parks Foundation — $17,000 · Recreation & SportsSierra St…Tahoe Rim Trail Association — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTahoe Rim…Tahoe Area Mountain Biking Association — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTahoe Are…NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFFS SEARCH & RESCUE I — $17,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$293,000Environment$90,000Health$78,000International$60,000Recreation & Sports$52,000Public Safety & Disaster$22,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE FOREST HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNevada Nordic — $25,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $24,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSierra State Parks Foundation — $17,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNEVADA COUNTY SHERIFFS SEARCH & RESCUE I — $17,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTAHOE INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL SCIENCE — $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTAHOE FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA BUTTES TRAIL STEWARDSHIP — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVASCULITIS FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTruckee Trails Foundation Inc — $9,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN AUTOIMMUNE RELATED DISEASES ASSOCIATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTruckee Dirt Union — $7,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTAHOE NORDIC SEARCH & RESCUE INC — $7,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTahoe Rim Trail Association — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTahoe Area Mountain Biking Association — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGHTSAVERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKING FOR A BETTER WORLD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Balam Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Truckee Community FoundationCA30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Tahoe Fund · Tahoe Community Foundation · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · The Corrigan-Walla Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Tahoe Mountain Resorts Environmental Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Park L Loughlin Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Gates Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lundrigan Walker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph