· Private foundation
The Luke and Whitney Pent Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOVE HAS NO LIMITS | $50,000 |
| FORT WORTH BIBLE CHURCH | $33,000 |
| USA TRANSFORM | $26,910 |
| HOPE FOR THE SILENT VOICES | $25,000 |
| CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE | $20,000 |
| FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| COVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL | $14,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| THE WEDGEWOOD CIRCLE | $7,500 |
| EDENS SONG MINISTRIES | $5,163 |
| DASH NETWORK | $5,000 |
| INNER CITY INVESTMENT CORP | $5,000 |
| HAWKWOOD FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TUCSON TORAH CENTER | $5,000 |
| ONE WORLD HEALTH | $2,550 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHOPE FOR THE SILENT VOICES6× · 2019–2024 · $170k · revenue +72% · 29% of their budget
- OHOneWorld Health4× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +78%
- LALIVE ACTION2× · 2020–2022 · $33k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- UIUnited in Purposeone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -69%
- THTHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2019 · $101k
- TPTurning Point Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Ftlm seeks to equip churches to minister to those who are suffering from addiction and equip christians with the resources needed to facilitate spiritual growth in christlike character and biblical wisdom.
Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Set Free Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Hawkwood Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE FOR THE SILENT VOICES ↗
- Who funds United in Purpose ↗
- Who funds WEST FORT WORTH CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds OneWorld Health ↗
- Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
- Who funds LOVE HAS NO LIMITS INC ↗
- Who funds Mastermedia International Inc ↗
- Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds SERVE HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds USATransform ↗
- Who funds 4AFRICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds DFW ASYLUM SEEKER HOUSING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds iHope Ministries ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEVERTHIRST INC ↗
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds WEDGWOOD CIRCLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Brooks and Caitlin McCabe Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Moriah Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Celanese Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Luke and Whitney Pent Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Luke and Whitney Pent Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Luke and Whitney Pent Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.