Skip to content
The Louis J Capano Jriii Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Louis J Capano Jriii Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$364kHuman Services$360kHousing & Shelter$304kHealth$164kPhilanthropy$110kRecreation & Sports$52kYouth Development$14kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF HOWARD UNIV GOLF$40,000
ROBIN HOOD$35,000
ARCHMERE ACADEMY$10,000
HUMANE ANIMAL PARTNERS$10,000
THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS$10,000
HBCU WEEK FOUNDATION$10,000
PALM BEACH POLICE & FIRE FDTNINC$9,000
VINCEREMOS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$6,000
ADOPT A FAMILY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC$6,000
THE EVERETT THEATRE$1,000
SOCIETA DA VINCI$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARY CAMPBELL CENTER: $130k → 10%MARY CAMPBELL CENTER: $120k → 10%MARY CAMPBELL CENTER: $70k → 10%MARY CAMPBELL CENTER: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$439k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$1.1M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARY CAMPBELL CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $360k · revenue +47%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $130k · revenue +40%
  • CD
    CASA DE AMMA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • RR
    REACH RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -91%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +62%
  • SN
    ST NICHOLAS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
2
Housing Alliance Delaware

Our mission is to advance housing opportunities, end homelessness, and promote thriving communities for all.

Housing & Shelter
3
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
6
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
7
Delaware Health Sciences Alliance Llc

Dhsa aligns resources and efforts to create a unique, broad-based alliance, focused on establishing innovative collaborations among experts in medical education, medical practice, health policy, nursing, workforce development and across…

Health
8
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
9
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
10
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
11
The Arc of Delaware Inc

The arc of delaware promotes and protects the human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and actively supports full inclusion and participation in the community through advocacy and services to individuals and…

Housing & Shelter
12
St Francis Hospital Inc

We, saint francis hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. francis hospital is a member of trinity health of the mid-atlantic…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mary Campbell Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Howard University Golf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST EDMONDS ACADEMY INC: $327,100 · OtherST EDMONDS ACADEMY INCARCHMERE ACADEMY: $74,340 · OtherARCHMERE ACADEMY+29 more: $101,050 · Other+29 moreTHE MARY CAMPBELL CENTER INC: $360,000 · Human ServicesTHE MARY CAMPBELL CENTER I…REACH RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterREACH RIVERSIDE DEVELO…CASA DE AMMA: $85,000 · HealthCASA DE AMMAVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $51,000 · HealthVinceremos R…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $12,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH …THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE BUONICON…+4 more: $11,500 · Health+4 moreROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $130,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD…DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE C…Friends of Howard University Golf: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsHUMANE ANIMAL PARTNERS: $15,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · Animals
Other$502,490Human Services$360,000Housing & Shelter$300,000Health$170,000Philanthropy$145,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Animals$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARY CAMPBELL CENTER INC: $360,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREACH RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $300,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE AMMA: $85,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $51,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFriends of Howard University Golf: $40,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL PARTNERS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDUFFYS HOPE INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER DELAWARE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAdopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetIl Circolo Inc: $1,900 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetST PATRICK'S CENTER INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE MILITARY ACADEMY SPOR BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETA DA VINCI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBRANDYWINE COUNSELING & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Fo…United Way of DelawareLaffey-McHugh Foundat…Longwood Foundation I…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Anthony & Catheri…Crestlea Foundation I…Nor' Easter Foundatio…Incyte Charitable Giv…Welfare Foundation IncWsfs Cares FoundationChubb Charitable Foun…
Delaware Community Foundation IncDE27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Longwood Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Anthony & Catherine Fusco Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Nor' Easter Foundation Inc · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation · Welfare Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Louis J Capano Jriii Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Louis J Capano Jriii Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Reach Riverside Development Corp: 100% of income from government
  • Duffys Hope Inc: 83% of income from government
  • West End Neighborhood House Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Humane Animal Partners: 14% of income from government
  • Brandywine Counseling & Community Services Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The Mary Campbell Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis J Capano Jriii Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home