Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Longleaf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$332kInternational$35kHousing & Shelter$30kCommunity Improvement$27kArts & Culture$27kEducation$12kEnvironment$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $60
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$11,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MODERN DAY$26,411
BROOKFIELD CHURCH$11,400
PASSION WORKS$10,000
WOUB PUBLIC MEDIA$60
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEALING HANDS OF JOY: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
OH
CA
CO
KY
MD
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$433k · 12 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +196% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
21

Total granted

$433k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+196%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MODERN DAY MISSIONS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +457%
  • RA
    RURAL ACTION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +244%
  • ZF
    ZIENZELE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $27k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOCKING COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • GC
    GATEWAY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • IG
    IRIS GLOBAL
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
2
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
3
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

6
One Days Wages

One Day's Wages is a movement of people, stories, and actions to alleviate extreme global poverty. One Day's Wages promotes awareness, invites giving, and supports sustainable relief through partnerships, especially with smaller…

International
7
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

8
Hope in the Harvest Missions

The organization's mission is to seek to cultivate christ's hope in underdeveloped and impoverished areas of the world through agricultural and personal transformation.

International
9
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
10
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
11
Orphanos Foundation

Christian-based aid to orphans

Human Services
12
Possibilities Africa

To mobilize and equip christians to become agents of spiritual and socio-economic transformation in africa.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Athens County Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Healing Hands of Joy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%46%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 46% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MODERN DAY MISSIONS — $207,099 · ReligionMODERN DAY MISSIONS+2 more — $603 · ReligionBROOKFIELD CHURCH INCORPORATED — $111,876 · OtherBROOKFIELD CHURCH INCORPORATEDHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIO — $9,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIOGATEWAY CHURCH — $6,450 · Other+19 more — $26,429 · Other+19 moreZIENZELE FOUNDATION — $26,500 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $2,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyRURAL ACTION INC — $27,418 · Community ImprovementPASSION WORKS — $21,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $114 · Arts & CultureGOOD WORKS INC — $18,000 · Housing & ShelterHOCKING COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · EducationThe Ohio University Foundation — $3,000 · Education
Religion$207,702Other$153,755Philanthropy$29,000Community Improvement$27,418Arts & Culture$21,114Housing & Shelter$18,000Education$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS — $207,099 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetRURAL ACTION INC — $27,418 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetZIENZELE FOUNDATION — $26,500 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPASSION WORKS — $21,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIO — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOCKING COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetIRIS GLOBAL — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealing Hands of Joy — $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRestoration Development Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Bible Study — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Friendships Inc — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST OHIO INDEPENDENT NEWS — $94 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRACE MEDIA INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS
  • Who funds RURAL ACTION INC
  • Who funds ZIENZELE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PASSION WORKS
  • Who funds GOOD WORKS INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIO
  • Who funds HOCKING COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds IRIS GLOBAL
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation
  • Who funds TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC
  • Who funds Hand in Hand Partnership
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO
  • Who funds Healing Hands of Joy
  • Who funds Restoration Development Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD INITIATIVES
  • Who funds Community Bible Study
  • Who funds International Friendships Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST OHIO INDEPENDENT NEWS
  • Who funds TRACE MEDIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoples Bank FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoples Bank Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Athens County Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Columbus Foundation · Foundation for Appalachian Ohio · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Longleaf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Longleaf Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Longleaf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph