Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

The Longleaf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
29%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$11,400
Largest grant, FY2025
$26,411
Organizations funded a year
7 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations The Longleaf Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 15% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$48k0%
FY20247$60k29%
FY202311$55k27%
FY20228$53k50%
FY202110$49k30%
FY202012$54k25%
FY201911$57k27%
FY201810$49k40%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$332kInternational$35kHousing & Shelter$30kCommunity Improvement$27kArts & Culture$27kEducation$12kEnvironment$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
OH
CA
CO
KY
MD
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Modern Day Missions$207,09991%
Brookfield Church Incorporated$111,8769n/a
Rural Action Inc$27,41870%
Zienzele Foundation$26,50056%
Passion Works$21,00031%
Good Works Inc$18,00061%
Hocking College Foundation Inc$9,00012%
Habitat for Humanity of Se Ohio$9,00040%
Gateway Church$6,4501n/a
Iris Global$4,00010%
Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of The Longleaf Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Modern Day Missions$207,09991%
Brookfield Church Incorporated$111,8769n/a
Rural Action Inc$27,41870%
Zienzele Foundation$26,50056%
Passion Works$21,00031%
Good Works Inc$18,00061%
Hocking College Foundation Inc$9,00012%
Habitat for Humanity of Se Ohio$9,00040%
Gateway Church$6,4501n/a
Iris Global$4,00010%
The Ohio University Foundation$3,00010%
Trees for the Future Inc$3,00030%
Hand in Hand Partnership$2,3504n/a
Healing Hands of Joy$1,70010%
Ohio University$1,3659n/a
Community Bible Study$50010%
Restoration Development Foundation Inc$50010%
Community Food Initiatives$50010%
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals$50010%
International Friendships Inc$10310%
Southeast Ohio Independent News$9410%
Trace Media Inc$2010%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($13k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Longleaf Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetModern Day Missions: $207,099 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetRural Action Inc: $27,418 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetZienzele Foundation: $26,500 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPassion Works: $21,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGood Works Inc: $18,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHocking College Foundation Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Se Ohio: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIris Global: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrees for the Future Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealing Hands of Joy: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRestoration Development Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Initiatives: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Friendships Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Ohio Independent News: $94 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrace Media Inc: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoples Bank FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoples Bank Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Athens County Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Columbus Foundation · Foundation for Appalachian Ohio · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Longleaf Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Longleaf Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Longleaf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Longleaf Foundation

How much does The Longleaf Foundation give?
The Longleaf Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $47,871 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Longleaf Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (71%), International (7%), Housing & Shelter (6%).
Who are The Longleaf Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Modern Day Missions ($207k), Brookfield Church Incorporated ($112k), Rural Action Inc ($27k).
Does The Longleaf Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Longleaf Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Longleaf Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Peoples Bank Foundation, Johnson Charitable Gift Fund, Athens County Foundation.
Where is The Longleaf Foundation based?
The Longleaf Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Longleaf’s filings →

More from the funding graph