Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Long Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$338k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$1.0MArts & Culture$303kCrime & Legal$268kHuman Services$135kHealth$120kHousing & Shelter$85kEmployment$70kYouth Development$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN SOUNDWAVES$20,000
AUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION FBO LITERACY FIRST$20,000
AVANCE-AUSTIN$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY$20,000
FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES$20,000
PELOTONU$18,000
CON MI MADRE$15,000
SAFE ALLIANCE$15,000
CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY$15,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE-TEXAS$15,000
BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN$15,000
E3 ALLIANCE$15,000
CAPITAL IDEA$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION FBO UTEACH$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF AUSTIN: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH CENTER SAN ANTONIO: $20k → 16%TSTC FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF AUSTIN: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF AUSTIN: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%BOOKSPRING: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $50k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $20k → 27%FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES: $15k → 10%FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES: $15k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $15k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $15k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $15k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $15k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $13k → 10%CON MI MADRE: $13k → 10%AVANCE-AUSTIN: $20k → 10%PELOTONU: $18k → 10%E3 ALLIANCE: $20k → 10%PELOTONU: $18k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $15k → 10%PELOTONU: $17k → 10%PELOTONU: $15k → 10%BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15k → 10%BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15k → 10%AVANCE-AUSTIN: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $15k → 10%BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15k → 10%BREAKTHROUGH AUSTIN: $15k → 10%E3 ALLIANCE: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15k → 10%E3 ALLIANCE: $15k → 10%E3 ALLIANCE: $15k → 10%PELOTONU: $15k → 10%CASA OF TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $14k → 10%PELOTONU: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of The Long Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Long Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 27 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against -68% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-68%

Still filing today

70%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +143%
  • AC
    AUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $118k · revenue +39%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • THE TSTC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -68%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH CENTER SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
2
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
3
Texas Assoc for College Admission Counseling Inc

Texas association for college admission counseling, inc.(tacac) provides support to those who are involved helping students through the postsecondary education planning process (continued on page 26).the organization also provides a…

Education
4
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Tex-E Inc
Education
7
Capacity Catalyst

We're on a mission to improve data use in the social sector by connecting capacity with need for a thriving equitable social data ecosystem.

Education
8
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
9
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
10
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
11
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
12
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is E3 Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Girl Empowerment Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY — $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEYAVANCE-AUSTIN — $135,150 · OtherAVANCE-AUSTINAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY — $117,500 · OtherAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY — $104,000 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTYTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $94,000 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCECOLLEGE FORWARD — $60,000 · OtherCOLLEGE FORWARDUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION FBO UTEACH — $55,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM — $50,000 · OtherSUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER — $43,000 · Other+6 more — $121,000 · Other+6 morePELOTONU INC — $106,100 · EducationPELOTONU INCCon Mi MADRE — $96,000 · EducationCon Mi MADREBREAKTHROUGH — $90,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGHE3 ALLIANCE — $82,500 · EducationE3 ALLIANCETodos Juntos Learning Center — $70,000 · EducationTodos Juntos Learning CenterTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationTHE TSTC FOUNDATIONAUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION — $45,000 · EducationAUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATIONBookSpring — $45,000 · EducationBookSpringHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $135,000 · Arts & CultureAnthropos Arts — $35,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $85,000 · Housing & ShelterGIRL EMPOWERMENT NETWORK — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $70,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION — $70,000 · Crime & LegalBetter ATX — $30,000 · Community ImprovementCODE2COLLEGE — $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,079,650Education$584,600Arts & Culture$170,000Housing & Shelter$125,000Human Services$70,000Crime & Legal$70,000Community Improvement$30,000Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $135,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetAUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY — $117,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONU INC — $106,100 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY — $104,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCon Mi MADRE — $96,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $94,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $90,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetE3 ALLIANCE — $82,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTodos Juntos Learning Center — $70,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION — $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE FORWARD — $60,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION — $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBookSpring — $45,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER — $43,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAnthropos Arts — $35,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetBetter ATX — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCODE2COLLEGE — $25,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds AUSTIN CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PELOTONU INC
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY
  • Who funds Con Mi MADRE
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds E3 ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Todos Juntos Learning Center
  • Who funds Capital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION
  • Who funds COLLEGE FORWARD
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION
  • Who funds BookSpring
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER
  • Who funds Anthropos Arts
  • Who funds Better ATX
  • Who funds CODE2COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX31.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Webber Family Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · The Applied Materials Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · Sooch Foundation · Philanthropitch · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · St David's Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Long Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Long Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Long Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph