Skip to content
The Logsdon Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Logsdon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$449kArts & Culture$202kEducation$181kEnvironment$115kPhilanthropy$88kFood & Nutrition$63kHuman Services$35kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cleveland Museum of Natural History$100,000
Andrews Osborne Academy$10,000
Good Samaritan Hunger Center$5,000
Burbank Parent Education Council$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%4 Paws for Ability: $2k → 9%Isle of Wight Christian Outreach Program: $10k → 9%Grace House Akron Inc: $200k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$422k · 10 repeat orgs$754k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
52

Total granted

$422k
$744k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+15%

Still filing today

40%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $155k · revenue +35%
  • CC
    Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    2× · 2018–2019 · $150k
  • CC
    Catholic Charities Disability Service
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k

Funded once

  • GH
    GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -42%
  • HF
    Holden Forests & Gardens
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • EC
    Emmanuel Christian Academy ACF Legacy Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $53k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
2
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
3
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
4
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
5
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
6
Greater Cleveland Sports Commission

The mission of the greater cleveland sports commission is to measurably improve the economy of greater cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing and enhancing significant sporting and competitive events.

Unclassified
7
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

—
8
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Cleveland Botanical Garden

The cleveland botanical garden connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
11
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
12
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Rape Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Burbank Parent Education Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cleveland Clinic Foundation: $150,000 · OtherCleveland Clinic FoundationHolden Forests & Gardens: $75,000 · OtherHolden Forests & GardensEmmanuel Christian Academy ACF Legacy Fund: $53,000 · OtherEmmanuel Christian Academy ACF Legacy FundCatholic Charities Disability Service: $30,000 · OtherDavid & Janice Logsdon Donor Advised Fund CO Akron Community Foundation: $25,000 · OtherGrace House: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+34 more: $189,350 · Other+34 moreGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUSE AKRON I…ISLE OF WIGHT CHRISTIAN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,750 · Human ServicesCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $155,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM…Akron Creative Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAkron Creative I…BALLET IN THE CITY INC: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationCLEVELAND…EMMANUEL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationEMMANUEL …BURBANK PARENT EDUCATION COUNCIL: $13,000 · EducationBURBANK P…ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationANDREWS O…AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy143 COLLECTIVE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGOOD SAMARITAN HUNGER CENTER: $25,000 · Food & NutritionAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionKISS THE GROUND: $10,000 · Food & NutritionALMA BACKYARD FARM: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $22,500 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $10,000 · HealthBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $5,000 · Health
Other$572,350Human Services$211,750Arts & Culture$180,000Education$98,000Philanthropy$65,000Food & Nutrition$61,000Health$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $155,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HUNGER CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetEMMANUEL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLE OF WIGHT CHRISTIAN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget143 COLLECTIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMMANUEL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAkron Creative Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALMA BACKYARD FARM: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBALLET IN THE CITY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUMPSTART INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING MEDINA COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSC GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUYAHOGA VALLEY COUNTRYSIDE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…Burton D Morgan Found…Dominion Energy Chari…Firstenergy FoundationHudson Community Foun…The Swagelok Foundati…The Westfield Insuran…The Richard S and Ali…Emma R Fox Char Trust…Mary S & David C Corb…Lehner Family Foundat…Gar Foundation
Akron Community FoundationOH23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Hudson Community Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · The Richard S and Alita Rogers Family Foundation · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Gar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Logsdon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Logsdon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Logsdon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home