Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Levine Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$403kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$20kInternational$11kHuman Services$9kHousing & Shelter$5kCivil Rights$5kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORAH V'SIMCHA$70,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DOVID ADOM$10,000
JEP CONGREGATIONS OF LONG ISLAND$2,500
HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC$1,000
JASA$1,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECT$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE$1,000
CHABAD HOUSE OF HARVARD SQUARE INC$1,000
MISASKIM CORP$1,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN N$1,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEITZMAN INS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISASKIM CORP: $1k → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $1k → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $1k → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $1k → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 16 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$360k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+35%

Still filing today

56%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCommunity ImprovementReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +211%
  • HF
    HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBUSH
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBU
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • GZ
    GEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
8
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
9
The Jerusalem Connection
—
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
12
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gemach Zichron Moshe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORAH V'SIMCHA: $271,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORAH V'SIMCHACONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBUSH: $60,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBUSHCONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBU: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH OF FLATBUAMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DOVID ADOM: $20,000 · Other+10 more: $23,500 · Other+10 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF INSTITUTE FOR ZIONIST: $1,000 · InternationalHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $5,000 · ReligionWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $5,000 · ReligionJASA CORPORATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementGEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $3,600 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Community ImprovementMISASKIM CORP: $5,000 · Human ServicesFLATBUSH VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLOH INC: $1,000 · HealthSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN: $500 · Education
Other$424,500Philanthropy$22,000International$12,000Religion$10,000Community Improvement$9,600Human Services$5,000Health$1,000Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJASA CORPORATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLATBUSH VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLOH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC ↗
  • Who funds JASA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds GEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FLATBUSH VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLOH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INSTITUTE FOR ZIONIST ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Levine Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Levine Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Levine Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Levine Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Levine Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph