Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lehman-Stamm Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$859k
Granted FY2025still arriving
106
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$1.0MCivil Rights$964kHealth$607kReligion$385kArts & Culture$344kPhilanthropy$310kEnvironment$213kCrime & Legal$189kOther$0
02FY2025 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k63 grants · $201k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $588k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES$70,000
LAMBDA LEGAL$37,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ILLINOIS$25,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$25,000
NPR FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTHLIGHT THEATER$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ILLINOIS$20,000
CHICAGO MEDIA PROJECT$17,500
ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS PROJECT$15,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER$15,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$15,000
WBEZ$15,000
CROSSROADS FUND$15,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRANS PRIDE INITIATIVE: $3k → 14%ASHREI FOUNDATION: $2k → 21%TRANS PRIDE INITIATIVE: $1k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $4k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $3k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $3k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $10k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $10k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
WY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 112 repeat orgs$521k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
98

Total granted

$3.2M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

48%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of Illinois
    5× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +77%
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $114k · revenue +41%
  • EL
    ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST
    5× · 2020–2025 · $98k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • YE
    YWCA Evanston North Shore
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • YE
    YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore
    one grant, 2021 · $21k · revenue -55%
  • NP
    National Public Housing Museum
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
2
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
6
Equality Illinois

Equality illinois builds a better illinois by advancing equal treatment and social justice through education, advocacy and protection of the rights of the lgbt community.

Philanthropy
7
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
8
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
9
Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc

Secure racial equity and economic opportunity for all

Crime & Legal
10
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
11
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
12
Human Rights Campaign Foundation

The human rights campaign foundation is organized for the charitable and educational purposes of promoting public education and welfare for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq+) community. the hrc foundation envisions…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tent Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 250 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/105
Grantees still filing
60/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $283,500 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICESTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC: $115,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER: $107,500 · Other+156 more: $2,255,898 · Other+156 morePlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $175,000 · HealthPlanned P…LAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC: $45,000 · HealthLAKE TANG…Repro TLC: $29,500 · HealthRepro TLCCHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $25,000 · HealthCHICAGO H…Equal Hope: $22,000 · HealthEqual Hop…AIDS Foundation of Chicago: $11,000 · Health+5 more: $16,000 · HealthLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $114,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $52,500 · Civil RightsLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $26,000 · Civil RightsACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $20,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights+3 more: $15,000 · Civil RightsEvanston Community Foundation: $84,555 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyThe Chicago Community Trust: $42,500 · PhilanthropyTent Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $42,500 · EducationAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $37,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $30,000 · EducationEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $30,000 · EducationCONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION: $12,000 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $97,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $15,000 · EnvironmentNeighbors for Environmental Justice: $15,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $11,500 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $7,500 · Environment+2 more: $3,500 · EnvironmentThe National Public Housing Museum: $76,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureEVANSTON ROUNDTABLE MEDIA NFP: $7,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $6,100 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,761,898Health$323,500Civil Rights$237,500Philanthropy$212,055Education$152,000Environment$150,000Arts & Culture$149,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $114,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $97,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC: $87,540 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEvanston Community Foundation: $84,555 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe National Public Housing Museum: $76,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $72,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $52,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO MEDIA PROJECT: $47,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetLAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC: $45,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $42,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS: $42,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $40,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $32,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY: $32,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $31,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEVANSTON SCHOLARS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLittle Village Environmental Justice Org: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRepro TLC: $29,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $29,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HOUSE & SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEqual Hope: $22,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNeighbors for Environmental Justice: $15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEQTX Equality Texas dba Equality Texas: $13,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONVERGENCE CENTER FOR POLICY RESOLUTION: $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTent Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds THE ROGER BALDWIN FOUNDATION OF ACLU INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Evanston Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The National Public Housing Museum ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MEDIA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds SHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds JAMES B MORAN CENTER FOR YOUTH ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ABORTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON SCHOLARS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kellcie FundIL38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kellcie Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Chicago Foundation for Women · Northwestern University · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lehman-Stamm Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lehman-Stamm Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lehman-Stamm Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Lehman-Stamm Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 250 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lehman-Stamm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph