Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leg Up Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$25kHealth$18kHuman Services$18kCivil Rights$16kAnimals$15kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$10kEnvironment$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPES LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC$15,000
OUTER BANKS HOTLINE$12,500
SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA$12,500
CHARLOTTESVILLE UNITED FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION$11,000
INTERNATIONAL NEIGHBORS$10,000
BLUE SKY FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA: $13k → 8%SHALOM FARMS: $5k → 9%SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$66k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +159%
  • TO
    THE OUTER BANKS HOTLINE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +25%
  • BS
    BLUE SKY FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WF
    WARTIME FITNESS WARRIORS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • GR
    Georges River Land Trust
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -8%
  • SF
    SHALOM FARMSINC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Dog Rescue

Rural Dog Rescue saves the lives of high risk dogs in economically challenged shelters in rural areas of the country. Our mission is to save the dogs that are at greatest risk of euthanasia and are the most overlooked dogs in the shelter.…

Animals
2
Veterans Healing Farm

Veterans Healing Farm enhances the mental, emotional, and physical well-being of our nations Veterans and their families.

Public Benefit
3
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
4
Future Harvest Inc

Working to advance agriculture that sustains the chesapeake region's farmers, communities, and environment.

Food & Nutrition
5
Old Dominion Humane Society

Old Dominion Humane Society provides well-matched, permanent homes for dogs in need through rescue, rehabilitation, and education.

Animals
6
Global Garden Refugee Training Farm

The mission of Global Garden Refugee Training Farms is to improve access to fresh vegetables for refugee families and their neighbors, and to reconnect displaced farmers with opportunities to grow healthy food and earn supplemental income.

Food & Nutrition
7
Farmhouse Fresh Animal Sanctuary

Rescue, rehabilitation, and lifelong sanctuary for neglected farm animals, while providing public education on animal welfare and compassionate care, and advocating for improved policies that protect animals.

Animals
8
Freedom Virginia Inc

Freedom virginia's mission is to advance common-sense solutions that will ensure all of virginia's working families have the economic security to thrive.

Public Benefit
9
Portsmouth Humane Society Inc

Provide shelter, care, and treatment to homeless animals in the city of portsmouth community through permanent adoptions, spay/neuter programs, and community education.

Animals
10
Tiny Hooves Rescue Inc

Tiny hooves is dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, and providing forever sanctuary to abandoned, abused, neglected, and unwanted farm animals while also inspiring positive change within the human and animal bond. we promote a vegan…

Animals
11
Virginia Animal Fighting Task Force

Aid in the eradication of animal fighting

Animals
12
Virginia German Shepherd Rescue Inc

Virginia german shepherd rescue is an all volunteer organization dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation and re-homing of the german shepherd dog (and sometimes other breeds/mixes). the rescue provide a safe haven for german shepherds who…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Service Dogs of Virginia Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Neighbors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLOTTESVILLE UNITED FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $16,000 · OtherCHARLOTTESVILLE UNITED FOR PUBLIC E…HOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC: $15,000 · OtherHOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INCLOCAL FOOD HUB INC: $5,000 · OtherLOCAL FOOD HUB INCBLUE SKY FUND: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLUE SKY FUNDWARTIME FITNESS WARRIORS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentWARTIME FITNESS WARRIORSSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGI…SHALOM FARMSINC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHALOM FARMSINCTHE OUTER BANKS HOTLINE INC: $17,500 · HealthTHE OUTER BANKS H…International Neighbors Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyInternati…Georges River Land Trust: $5,000 · Environment
Other$36,000Youth Development$25,000Human Services$22,500Health$17,500Philanthropy$10,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OUTER BANKS HOTLINE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBLUE SKY FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE'S LEGACY EQUINE RESCUE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetInternational Neighbors Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWARTIME FITNESS WARRIORS: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetGeorges River Land Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHALOM FARMSINC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOCAL FOOD HUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund · Caplin Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leg Up Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leg Up Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Leg Up Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Leg Up Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leg Up’s filings →

    More from the funding graph