Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lee and Yum Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$362k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.1MHealth$664kPublic Benefit$58kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$10kReligion$8kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $270k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Binghamton University$120,000
Princeton University$100,000
UHS Foundation$50,000
BCC Foundation$40,000
Lourdes Foundation$35,000
American Legion Post 357$10,000
Broome County Arts Council$6,000
Manheim Township School District$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 22 repeat orgs$293k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
48

Total granted

$2.6M
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+49%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPublic BenefitArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $605k · revenue +129%
  • SA
    SEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $130k · revenue +145%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 357
    4× · 2021–2024 · $53k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $90k
  • AE
    AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICE
    one grant, 2019 · $37k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nysarc Inc Broome-Chenango- Tioga Counties Chapter; the most unlike its peers is Twin Tiers Honor Flight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Binghamton University: $1,145,823 · OtherBinghamton UniversityBCC Foundation: $163,326 · OtherBCC FoundationLourdes Foundation: $140,000 · OtherLourdes FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · Other+57 more: $385,427 · Other+57 moreUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $605,250 · HealthUNITED HEALTH SERVICES …The Trustees of Princeton University: $200,000 · EducationThe Trustees …SEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $130,000 · EducationSEVERANCE ALU…+2 more: $5,394 · EducationBROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN TIERS HONOR FLIGHT INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitCAMP FREEDOM INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$1,924,576Health$605,250Education$335,394Arts & Culture$11,000Public Benefit$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $605,250 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $130,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 357: $53,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetBROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTWIN TIERS HONOR FLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetELMIRA COLLEGE: $3,394 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGANNON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP FREEDOM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Petersburg Country ClubInc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW SCHOOL OF LANCASTER DBA NEW SCHOOL MONTESSORI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds SEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 357 ↗
  • Who funds BROOME COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NYSARC INC BROOME-CHENANGO- TIOGA COUNTIES CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds TWIN TIERS HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMIRA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GANNON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tsb Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tsb Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lee and Yum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lee and Yum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • St Petersburg Country ClubInc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lee and Yum’s filings →

More from the funding graph