Skip to content
The Lchayim Charitable Trust Ua 062091 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lchayim Charitable Trust Ua 062091

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$67kArts & Culture$10kEducation$7k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$540
Median grant
1
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANETTO HILL JEWISH CENTER$1,280
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND NOVA FDN$540
B'NAI JESHURUN$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEBREW COLLEGE: $500 → 8%TEMPLE EMANU-EL: $3k → 10%TEMPLE CHAYAI SHALOM: $2k → 11%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $1k → 12%IKAR SYNAGOGUE: $1k → 14%JEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND: $180 → 6%JEWISH GEN: $2k → 17%ADAS ISRAEL: $2k → 14%CLUB Z INC: $720 → 8%CONGREGATION B'NAI AMOONA: $500 → 11%GREATER THINGS FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%MEMPHIS BLUES SOCIETY: $2k → 17%FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH OF BERGEN COUN: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF INTERFAITH ENCOUNTER ASS: $360 → 6%B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $1k → 8%TEMPLE NER TAMID: $18k → 10%TEMPLE CHAYAI SHALOM: $1k → 11%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $500 → 12%IKAR: $1k → 14%MANETTO HILL JEWISH CENTER: $1k → 6%HADASSAH: $1k → 17%ADAS ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE: $2k → 14%MEMPHIS BLUES SOCIETY: $500 → 17%GROW TORAH INC: $900 → 7%B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $1k → 8%TEMPLE NER TAMID: $12k → 10%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $360 → 12%IKAR: $1k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND NOVA FDN: $540 → 6%HADASSAH: $360 → 17%ADAS ISRAEL: $2k → 14%B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $500 → 8%IKAR: $800 → 14%MANETTO HILL JEWISH CENTER: $360 → 6%B'NAI JESHURUN: $2k → 17%IKAR: $500 → 14%B'NAI JESHURUN: $2k → 17%MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $2k → 14%B'NAI JESHURUN: $360 → 17%VAUD AND THE VILLAINS: $3k → 14%B'NAI JESHURUN: $180 → 17%DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 11 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$61k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
-2%

Still filing today

18%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $540 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    TEMPLE NER TAMID INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k
  • DT
    DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +4%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH OF BERGEN COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • GT
    GREATER THINGS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • VA
    VAUD AND THE VILLAINS
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE NER TAMID INC: $30,000 · OtherTEMPLE NER TAMID INCCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN: $4,040 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUNADAS ISRAEL: $3,500 · OtherIKAR: $3,300 · OtherFRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH OF BERGEN COUNTY: $3,000 · OtherTEMPLE CHAYAI SHALOM: $3,000 · OtherGREATER THINGS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherVAUD AND THE VILLAINS: $3,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $2,625 · OtherB NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $2,500 · OtherMEMPHIS BLUES SOCIETY: $2,500 · Other+12 more: $12,738 · Other+12 moreDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $6,800 · EducationDE TOLEDO…HEBREW COLLEGE: $500 · EducationHEBREW CO…NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,860 · Arts & CultureJEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND: $180 · Arts & CultureGROWTORAH INC: $900 · Environment
Other$73,203Education$7,300Arts & Culture$2,040Environment$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $6,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH GEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROWTORAH INC: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH GEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GROWTORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundCombined Jewish Phila…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Jewish Communal FundNY17.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lchayim Charitable Trust Ua 062091 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lchayim Charitable Trust Ua 062091. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hebrew College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lchayim Charitable Trust Ua 062091’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home