Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Larson Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$347kHuman Services$261kInternational$175kCrime & Legal$56kEducation$12kPublic Benefit$5kSocial Science$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
$2,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$334k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAPE HOPE$33,197
ASSEMBLY OF GODGEN'L COUNCIL$28,500
THINK SMALL$9,600
BETHANY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY$6,300
PRAGER UNIVERSITY$5,000
REACH MINISTRY$3,700
PRISONERS FOR CHRIST OUTREACH MINISTRIES$3,600
SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL$2,400
SAVE ONE$2,200
4 THE WORLD RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION$600
TURNING POINT$350
CANYON HILL COMMUNITY CHURCH$250
YOUTH DYNAMICS$200
MEDICAL TEAMS WORLDWIDE$200
BRIDGES FOR PEACE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $278k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 9%AGAPE HOPE: $33k → 9%AGAPE HOPE: $29k → 9%AGAPE HOPE: $17k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $28k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $26k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $26k → 9%MINISTRY RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$849k · 30 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$849k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+62%

Still filing today

53%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalReligionCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    THINKSMALL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +166%
  • PF
    PRISONERS FOR CHRIST OUTREACH MINIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +88%
  • SH
    SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • DI
    DISCOVERY INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • VM
    VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
2
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
7
Explore God Network
—
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Dove On the Rise International

Expansion of the Gospel of Christ through training literature and digital teaching materials.

—
10
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
11
Propagate Media Incorporaton

This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…

Religion
12
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thinksmall; the most unlike its peers is Abba's Ambassadors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSEMBLY OF GODGEN'L COUNCIL: $246,100 · OtherASSEMBLY OF GODGEN'L COUNCILWESTMINSTER CHAPEL: $28,560 · OtherWESTMINSTER CHAPELBETHANY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY: $27,125 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLYOREGON MINISTRY NETWORK: $16,800 · Other+29 more: $43,504 · Other+29 moreAGAPE HOPE: $250,672 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOPESHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $27,300 · Human ServicesSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL+1 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHINKSMALL: $131,467 · InternationalTHINKSMALL+2 more: $2,400 · InternationalPRISONERS FOR CHRIST OUTREACH MINIS: $39,200 · Crime & LegalSaveOne: $16,350 · Crime & LegalREACH MINISTRY: $13,100 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,800 · EducationThe Legacy Institute: $500 · Education4 THE WORLD RESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS: $900 · ReligionTurning Point: $700 · Religion+1 more: $50 · Religion
Other$362,089Human Services$284,472International$133,867Crime & Legal$55,550Philanthropy$13,350Education$11,300Religion$1,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAPE HOPE: $250,672 over 9y, 12% of budgetTHINKSMALL: $131,467 over 9y, 14% of budgetPRISONERS FOR CHRIST OUTREACH MINIS: $39,200 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $27,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSaveOne: $16,350 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetREACH MINISTRY: $13,100 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Dynamics: $2,140 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS WORLDWIDE: $2,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOPAL HOUSE: $900 over 2y, 0.4% of budget4 THE WORLD RESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS: $900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTurning Point: $700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Legacy Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRemember NHU Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION FIRST: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABBA'S AMBASSADORS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMusic Center of the Northwest: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREVELATION MEDIA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGAPE HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THINKSMALL ↗
  • Who funds PRISONERS FOR CHRIST OUTREACH MINIS ↗
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SaveOne ↗
  • Who funds REACH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Youth Dynamics ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds OPAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds 4 THE WORLD RESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point ↗
  • Who funds The Legacy Institute ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Remember NHU Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION FIRST ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ABBA'S AMBASSADORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · GiveClear Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Bright Funds Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Larson Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Larson Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Larson Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Larson Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph