Skip to content

· Public charity

The Larry Payne Foundation

To make contributions for the benefit of any 501(3)(c) school

$463k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$991k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $351,045, the rows itemized in this filing. The $463,060 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $112,015 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $242k
$10,125
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE USM FOUNDATION$149,260
UNIV OF MS MEDICAL$92,742
FRANCIS MARION UNIV$37,257
ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$36,488
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$10,125
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$8,200
JONES COLLEGE$5,931
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$5,612
MS GULF COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,430
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INDIANA UNIV OF PENNSAVANIA: $5k → 14%UNI OC CALIFORNIA-IRVINE: $17k → 10%FRANCIS MARION UNIV: $37k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $8k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $22k → 18%MS GULF COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 18%JONES COLLEGE: $6k → 18%THE USM FOUNDATION: $270k → 22%UNIV OF MS MEDICAL: $93k → 23%LAMAR SCHOOL: $10k → 24%MARINERS CHURCH PRESCHOOL: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $7k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $12k → 18%THE USM FOUNDATION: $149k → 22%ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $36k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $6k → 18%THE USM FOUNDATION: $145k → 22%UNIV OF MS MEDICAL: $23k → 23%THE USM FOUNDATION: $77k → 22%THE USM FOUNDATION: $37k → 22%SACRED HEART SCHOOL: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$849k · 4 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +154% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$849k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%
+24%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $677k · revenue +154%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $116k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k
  • MC
    MARINERS CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k
  • LS
    LAMAR SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
7
Shippensburg University Student Services Incorporated

The corporation is organized to manage and coordinate student services at shippensburg university consistent with the statutory authority granted to the president of the university and the officially recognized student government…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
10
Andrews University

Education

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Country Schoolhouse Education Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $677,126 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIONFRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,257 · Education+2 more: $15,051 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTER: $115,886 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CE…UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $40,172 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPIST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $36,488 · OtherST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $17,335 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF …BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $15,428 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AL…MARINERS CHURCH: $15,024 · OtherMARINERS CHURCHSACRED HEART CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,125 · Other+2 more: $11,361 · Other
Education$729,434Other$261,819

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $677,126 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetFRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,257 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLAMAR SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $9,872 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $5,179 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LAMAR SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinebelt FoundationMS17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinebelt Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Larry Payne Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Larry Payne Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Larry Payne Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Larry Payne Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larry Payne’s filings →

    More from the funding graph