Skip to content
The Lanzillotti Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lanzillotti Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$140kEducation$103kHealth$35kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$8kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$6kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRIVE STRONG INC$20,000
HIGHLAND-CASHIERS LAND TRUST INC$15,000
ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INCORPORATED$10,000
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC$5,000
GIRLS PLACE INC$3,176
BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC$3,000
CAMP BOGGY CREEK$3,000
COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA HOSPICE: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 13 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$319k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+23%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DRIVE STRONG INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $102k · revenue +11%
  • AC
    ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +47%
  • PA
    Performing Arts Center Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AM
    ACTION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • HC
    HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HOSP FND
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • ZF
    ZEKENETIC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conserving Carolina

To protect, restore, and inspire appreciation of the natural world.

Environment
2
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
3
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
6
Georgia Conservancy Inc

To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.

Environment
7
Catawba Lands Conservancy

As a nationally accredited land trust, we conserve and manage land for public benefit in North Carolinas Southern Piedmont. We have conserved 235 properties, totaling 17,786 acres of land. We also facilitate the creation of a 1600 mile…

Environment
8
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
9
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
10
Lowcountry Land Trust Inc

To protect land and water forever, nurture relationships between people and place, and connect conservation to community.

Environment
11
Triangle Land Conservancy Inc

Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…

Environment
12
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Florida Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Drive Strong Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $74,000 · EnvironmentHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust IncALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $61,000 · EnvironmentALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INCDRIVE STRONG INC: $102,000 · EducationDRIVE STRONG INC+1 more: $500 · EducationIRON HORSE THERAPY INC: $6,354 · OtherIRON HORSE TH…BOGGY CREEK HOLE IN THE WALL: $5,000 · OtherBOGGY CREEK H…SALVATION ARMY FLORIDA DIVISION: $5,000 · OtherSALVATION ARM…ST AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE …COVNANT HOUSE: $5,000 · OtherCOVNANT HOUSETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CO…COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUS…ACTION MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 · OtherACTION MINIST…HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HOSP FND: $2,000 · OtherZEKENETIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC: $18,300 · HealthTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $8,000 · HealthPerforming Arts Center Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureGirls Place Inc: $4,849 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Bird Conservancy: $4,500 · AnimalsNORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA HOSPICE INC: $500 · Human Services
Environment$135,000Education$102,500Other$41,354Health$26,300Arts & Culture$20,000Youth Development$4,849Animals$4,500Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRIVE STRONG INC: $102,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $74,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $61,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPerforming Arts Center Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC: $18,300 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIRON HORSE THERAPY INC: $6,354 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetGirls Place Inc: $4,849 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA HOSPICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRIVE STRONG INC ↗
  • Who funds Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Performing Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON HORSE THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Girls Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA HOSPICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lanzillotti Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lanzillotti Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lanzillotti Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home