Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$247kHuman Services$146kFood & Nutrition$88kRecreation & Sports$80kAnimals$63kHealth$49kEnvironment$26kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
$5,181
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAMSON MUSEUM$26,094
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$10,000
HARVEST HOUSE$10,000
KLRU$7,000
SKY HIGH FOR KIDS$5,181
HRS TRUE HOPE$5,100
TEXAS PERFORMING ARTS$5,000
ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $5k → 12%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $3k → 12%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $5k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $5k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $5k → 8%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $55k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $35k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $25k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $11k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $8k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $8k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 16 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$683k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $146k · revenue +62%
  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +30%
  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +320%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COUNTY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $51k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS LADY BIRD JOHNSON WILDFLOWER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LAKE MCQUEENEY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
2
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
3
Austin Community Foundation Inc

We mobilize ideas and resources to strengthen central texas.

Philanthropy
4
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
6
Affordable Central Texas Inc

Texas housing conservancy (txhc) is a nonprofit that preserves long-term affordability in multifamily housing for texas' workforce by leveraging private capital without ongoing public subsidy.

Housing & Shelter
7
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
8
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
9
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
10
Hospice Austin Fund

The fund is a type 1 supporting organization of hospice austin. assets of the fund are used for maintenance, support, and operations of hospice austin programs.

—
11
Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood. We believe that Texas critical low-income housing and community development needs can best be solved…

Housing & Shelter
12
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KLRU: $123,500 · OtherKLRUYMBL Sunshine Foundation: $60,000 · OtherYMBL Sunshine FoundationWILLIAMSON MUSEUM: $52,188 · OtherWILLIAMSON MUSEUMWILLIAMSON COUNTY MUSEUM: $51,026 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS LADY BIRD JOHNSON WILDFLOWER CENTER: $20,000 · Other+11 more: $50,728 · Other+11 moreHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $146,160 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILD…HARVEST HOUSE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesHARVEST HOUSE INCTHE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $62,500 · AnimalsST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC: $7,781 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $47,500 · ReligionTIDELINES INSTITUTE: $20,500 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH: $2,010 · EducationHRS TRUE HOPE INC: $16,793 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$397,442Human Services$188,660Animals$62,500Health$49,281Religion$47,500Education$22,510Philanthropy$21,793

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $146,160 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $62,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYMBL Sunshine Foundation: $60,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $47,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC: $35,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTIDELINES INSTITUTE: $20,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHRS TRUE HOPE INC: $16,793 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC: $7,781 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL ATX: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BURKE FOUNDATION INC: $2,573 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $2,010 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds YMBL Sunshine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDELINES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HRS TRUE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL ATX ↗
  • Who funds THE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BURKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Harvest House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lanoe & Paul Scherer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph