· Private foundation
The Lalor Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $920k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $48,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $48,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER | $48,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $48,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $48,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $48,000 |
| BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL | $48,000 |
| MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $48,000 |
| CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $48,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $48,000 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE | $35,000 |
| NATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH NETWORK | $35,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK | $35,000 |
| NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS | $35,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.
58 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BCBaylor College of Medicine5× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +47%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY4× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +76%- UOUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation3× · 2017–2021 · $107k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $103k
- TCTHE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIone grant, 2022 · $55k
- OHOTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OTTAWA ON CANADAone grant, 2017 · $55k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…
Gynuity health projects works to develop and advocate for the use of scientific, clinical and programmatic evidence in reproductive and maternal health, assuring that each individual benefits from the fruits of medical science and…
National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…
Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.
Healthq is committed to providing sexual and reproductive healthcare without judgment or barriers.
Our mission is to define the standards, certify obstetricians and gynecologists, and facilitate continuous learning to advance knowledge, practice, and professionalism in women's health.
The national institute for reproductive health action fund conducts non-partisan issue advocacy and electoral engagement to advance reproductive health, rights, and justice in states and cities across the country. nirh action fund builds…
How this is measured
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · New Venture Fund · National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Together Women Rise · Women Donors Network · The Educational Foundation of America · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Lalor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lalor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lalor Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Lalor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Lalor’s filings →