Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

The Laber Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
13
Organizations funded FY2020
46%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$1,800
Largest grant, FY2020
$12,580
Organizations funded a year
7 to 13
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
8
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 46% of the organizations The Laber Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 40% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
ReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202013$47k46%
FY20197$49k57%
FY201813$88k62%
FY201710$62kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$187kRecreation & Sports$14kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$6kEducation$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
TN
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Keren Peulos$23,0002n/a
Friends of Mayanot Institute Inc$17,00031%
Camp Gan-Israel Inc$14,1003n/a
Healing Hearts Inc$10,7701n/a
Friends of Lubavitch of Florida Inc$5,5001n/a
Bais Chabad of Kalkaska Inc$5,00011%
Lubavitch Educational Center$4,8002n/a
Chabad Lubavitch of Greenwich Inc$3,6001n/a
Hebrew Academy for Special Children Inc$3,26410%
Chabad at Uic Inc$3,0402n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of The Laber Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Keren Peulos$23,0002n/a
Friends of Mayanot Institute Inc$17,00031%
Camp Gan-Israel Inc$14,1003n/a
Healing Hearts Inc$10,7701n/a
Friends of Lubavitch of Florida Inc$5,5001n/a
Bais Chabad of Kalkaska Inc$5,00011%
Lubavitch Educational Center$4,8002n/a
Chabad Lubavitch of Greenwich Inc$3,6001n/a
Hebrew Academy for Special Children Inc$3,26410%
Chabad at Uic Inc$3,0402n/a
Rabbinical College of America$2,00010%
Bais Menachem Inc$1,8001n/a

Plus 16 recipients with no EIN on record ($151k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Laber Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Laber Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Laber Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Laber Foundation Inc

How much does The Laber Foundation Inc give?
The Laber Foundation Inc reported 13 grants totaling $46,690 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does The Laber Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Religion (76%), Recreation & Sports (6%), Human Services (4%).
Who are The Laber Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Keren Peulos ($23k), Friends of Mayanot Institute Inc ($17k), Camp Gan-Israel Inc ($14k).
Does The Laber Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 46% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Laber Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Laber Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Krinsky Foundation Inc, Rebbe's Partnership Foundation.
Where is The Laber Foundation Inc based?
The Laber Foundation Inc is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laber’s filings →

More from the funding graph