· Private foundation
The Kurzrok Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ABILIS | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH | $6,000 |
| GREENWICH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION - ANNUAL FUND | $5,000 |
| CROSS CULTURE CARE | $5,000 |
| LET'S WIN PANCREATIC FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $4,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEP | $4,000 |
| VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY | $3,500 |
| ST MICHAEL'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $3,500 |
| NORTHEAST GREENWICH ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| FEEDING WESTCHESTER | $3,000 |
| MY SISTERS PLACE | $2,000 |
| HOUR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GAGREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +120%
- GHGREENWICH HOSPITAL5× · 2017–2021 · $39k · revenue +48%
- AIABILIS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- SISKY IS THE LIMIT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $6k
- NNNAPLES NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINICSone grant, 2017 · $5k
- RREADWORKSINCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Family centers inc. is a non-stock, nonprofit corporation whose mission is to empower children, adults, families and communities to realize their potential. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Dog Refuge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ABILIS INC ↗
- Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CROSS CULTURAL CARE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMPLE TABLE FOR EVERYONE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BULLDOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds My Sisters Place Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST GREENWICH ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
- Who funds Literacy Volunteers of Collier County Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · United Way of Greenwich Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kurzrok Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Jewish Family Services of Greenwich — 41% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
- Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Kurzrok Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Kurzrok Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.