Skip to content
The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi at a glance

· Private foundation

The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$577k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$422k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$610kYouth Development$110kFood & Nutrition$44kHealth$41kReligion$40kPublic Benefit$31kScience & Tech$18kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $422k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$804k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$422,461
INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT$50,000
SRCM HEARTFULNESS MEDITATION CENTRE$25,000
CITY OF BEAVERCREEK -4TH OF JULY SP$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HCO (HINDU TEMPLE OF DAYTON)$10,000
FEED THE CREEK$6,000
DAYTON FOOD BANK$6,000
GREENE COUNTY FISH PANTRY$5,000
AMERICAN ASSOC OF PHYSICIANS OF IN$5,000
SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY$5,000
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY-BOWLING-LAD$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,501
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$1,000
TOWARD INDEPENDENCE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $1k → 21%TOWARD INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 9%HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
OH
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 16 repeat orgs$647k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
38

Total granted

$314k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+36%

Still filing today

69%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $81k · revenue +26%
  • FT
    FEED THE CREEK
    6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +127%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IE
    INDUS EDUCATIONAL & EM FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • ER
    EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +40%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICI
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
4
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
University of Toledo Physicians Clinical Faculty Inc

To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $422,461 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $81,387 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY+1 more: $5,000 · EducationINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT: $50,000 · OtherINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMEN…INDUS EDUCATIONAL & EM FUND: $30,000 · OtherINDUS EDUCATIONAL & EM FUNDCITY OF BEAVERCREEK -4TH OF JULY SP: $25,000 · OtherCITY OF BEAVERCREEK -4TH OF JU…SRCM HEARTFULNESS MEDITATION CENTRE: $25,000 · OtherSRCM HEARTFULNESS MEDITATION C…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY: $18,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGYEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherHCO (HINDU TEMPLE OF DAYTON): $11,000 · OtherDAYTON FOOD BANK: $11,000 · OtherMIAMI VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICI: $10,000 · Other+35 more: $51,950 · Other+35 moreYOUTH GROUP FOR INDIAN CULTURE: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH GROUP …FEED THE CREEK: $25,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 · Food & NutritionGREENE COUNTY FISH PANTRY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOODBANK INC: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionMCKINLEY HALL INC: $7,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 · HealthAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,001 · HealthOur Lady of the Lake Foundation: $1,000 · HealthEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $9,030 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalVIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW: $1,000 · InternationalHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $1,000 · Human ServicesTOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Education$508,848Other$262,950Youth Development$110,000Food & Nutrition$37,000Health$23,001International$16,530Human Services$3,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $422,461 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH GROUP FOR INDIAN CULTURE: $110,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $81,387 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CREEK: $25,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $9,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWright State University Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,001 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,700 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetFRIES COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOODBANK INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWe Care Arts Inc: $1,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PRAGATHI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation Dep…The Dayton FoundationGreene County Communi…Dayton Foundation Plu…Levin Family Foundati…Mathile Family Founda…Synchrony FoundationThe Berry Family Foun…The Springfield Found…The Troy FoundationAssurant FoundationShell USA Company Fou…
Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · Greene County Community Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Levin Family Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · The Springfield Foundation · The Troy Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home