· Private foundation
The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $422k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $422,461 |
| INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT | $50,000 |
| SRCM HEARTFULNESS MEDITATION CENTRE | $25,000 |
| CITY OF BEAVERCREEK -4TH OF JULY SP | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HCO (HINDU TEMPLE OF DAYTON) | $10,000 |
| DAYTON FOOD BANK | $6,000 |
| FEED THE CREEK | $6,000 |
| SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY | $5,000 |
| GREENE COUNTY FISH PANTRY | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOC OF PHYSICIANS OF IN | $5,000 |
| WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY-BOWLING-LAD | $2,500 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $1,501 |
| TOWARD INDEPENDENCE | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2023 · $81k · revenue +26%- FTFEED THE CREEK6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +127%
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- IEINDUS EDUCATIONAL & EM FUNDone grant, 2022 · $30k
- EREDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +40%
- MVMIAMI VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH GROUP FOR INDIAN CULTURE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CREEK ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds MCKINLEY HALL INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OF INDIAN ORIGIN ↗
- Who funds Wright State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY FISH PANTRY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIES COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds We Care Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · Greene County Community Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Levin Family Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · The Springfield Foundation · The Troy Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Krishan and Vicky Joshi Foundation C/O Krishan Joshi funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.