Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kourland-Cooperman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$141kReligion$69kEducation$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHealth$4kInternational$254Animals$250Human Services$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,360
Median grant
5
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE KOL AMI EMANU-EL$5,200
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$5,000
L D KESHER INC$4,950
BETH TORAH BENNY ROK CAMPUS$2,815
BETH DAVID CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE$2,500
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$1,860
Individual grant recipient$1,360
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$250
FLORIDA DENTAL ASSOCIATION$125
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$100
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH HOSPITAL$100
SID JACOBSON JCC$100
ASPCA$100
FRIENDS OF IDF$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SID JACOBSON JCC: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
CA
UT
CO
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$103k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+67%

Still filing today

40%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +96%
  • LC
    LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +177%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $500 · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UH
    UM HURRICANE CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • HO
    HATZALAH OF SOUTH FLORIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $460
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $140,598 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC+2 more: $158 · PhilanthropyL D KESHER INC: $28,861 · OtherL D KESHER INCTEMPLE KOL AMI EMANU-EL: $21,500 · OtherTEMPLE KOL AMI EMANU-ELBETH TORAH ADATH YESHURUN INC: $14,623 · OtherBETH TORAH ADATH YESHURUN INCUM HURRICANE CLUB: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,890 · Other+19 more: $8,281 · Other+19 moreUniversity of Miami: $28,100 · EducationUniversity of…LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,000 · EducationLEHRMAN COMMU…+1 more: $500 · EducationAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $205 · HealthNEWBORN FOUNDATION: $180 · HealthSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 · Health+1 more: $36 · HealthJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $104 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150 · AnimalsSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 · Human Services
Philanthropy$140,756Other$81,155Education$30,600Health$1,471International$204Animals$150Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $140,598 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $28,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $205 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBORN FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $104 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Florida Baptist Hospital Foundation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEWBORN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds South Florida Baptist Hospital Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kourland-Cooperman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kourland-Cooperman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kourland-Cooperman’s filings →

More from the funding graph