Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Klug Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$103kHealth$79kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$28kEducation$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kCivil Rights$12kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$864k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY NAME OF JESUS EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC CHURCH$13,200
RAWHIDE BOYS RANCH$7,500
WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
CENTER FOR DEAF & BLIND$4,000
FOUNDATION FOR RELIGIOUS RETIREMENT$4,000
LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC$4,000
LIFE'S CONNECTION$3,000
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA - WISCONSIN CHAPTER$3,000
ASHIPPUN LIONS CLUB$1,500
VILLAGE OF LAC LABELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT$1,000
VCY AMERICA$1,000
ASHIPPUN FIRE DEPT INC$1,000
NEOSHO-RUBICON-ASHIPPUN POLICE DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFE'S CONNECTION: $3k → 5%HESED HOUSE: $2k → 8%LIFE'S CONNECTION: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
IA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$294k · 29 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
25

Total granted

$294k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+67%

Still filing today

24%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RAWHIDE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +72%
  • WR
    WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND
    5× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +11%
  • LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE SEMINARY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
2
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
3
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
4
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
5
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
6
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Legal Action of Wisconsin Inc

Legal action exists to provide creative, effective, and high-quality legal representation in order to achieve justice for low-income people and others to whom it would otherwise be denied. we advocate for empowerment and systemic change to…

Crime & Legal
9
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
10
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
11
Willamette Vital Health

We provide comprehensive hospice care services, supportive care for pain & symptom management for those with serious illness, and grief support. through our mission, willamette vital health supports adults and children living with a…

Human Services
12
American Anglican Council

Aac's purpose is to build up and defend great commission anglican churches in north america through developing faithful leaders, equipping local churches and engaging the church and culture with gospel clarity.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY NAME OF JESUS EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $59,075 · OtherHOLY NAME OF JESUS EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC CHURCHRAWHIDE INC: $27,500 · OtherRAWHIDE INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEWISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $24,000 · OtherWISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUNDHOLY NAME OF JESUS: $20,900 · OtherHOLY NAME OF JESUSWISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE FOUNDATION - VERITAS SOCIETY: $18,000 · OtherWISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE FOUNDATION - VERITAS SOCIETYCENTER FOR DEAF & BLIND: $13,500 · OtherCHARLOTTE LOZIER INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Other+37 more: $92,400 · Other+37 moreLAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC: $13,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $800 · HealthST COLETTA OF WISCONSIN INC: $8,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationLIFE'S CONNECTION INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $2,000 · Human ServicesHEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC D/B/A HEBRON HOUSING SERVICES: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · Public BenefitVCY AMERICA INC: $1,000 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $100 · Religion
Other$290,375Health$14,800Education$10,500Human Services$6,500Housing & Shelter$2,000Public Benefit$2,000Religion$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAWHIDE INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND: $24,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASHIPPUN FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetST COLETTA OF WISCONSIN INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE'S CONNECTION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC D/B/A HEBRON HOUSING SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTroops Direct: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHAUER ARTS & ACTIVITIES CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHIPPUN FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST COLETTA OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Paralyzed Veterans of America - Wisconsin Chapter ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC D/B/A HEBRON HOUSING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VCY AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Troops Direct ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Klug Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Klug Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Klug Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Klug Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Klug Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph