Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kilrea Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$538kRecreation & Sports$268kPublic Benefit$110kHealth$36kReligion$32kEnvironment$11kHousing & Shelter$11kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$85,000
WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$50,000
DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$25,000
HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION$18,400
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
CONGAREE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO BOOTH SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$10,000
THE NORA PROJECT$10,000
CATO INSTITUTE$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE$5,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC$5,000
POPE JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
BLUFFTON SELF HELP$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$911k · 20 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
13

Total granted

$911k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+29%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    4× · 2020–2024 · $235k · revenue +24%
  • DM
    DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +89%
  • HC
    HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • WE
    WGA EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $140,000 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONWGA EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherWGA EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $25,000 · OtherU OF C BOOTH SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $20,000 · OtherDEEP WELL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+19 more: $78,250 · Other+19 moreMarquette University: $235,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityUniversity of Chicago: $30,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $15,000 · EducationLeap Learning Systems: $10,000 · EducationTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE…CATO INSTITUTE: $55,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITU…+1 more: $2,500 · Public BenefitHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $78,400 · PhilanthropyCongaree Foundation: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentNorthwestern University: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$473,250Education$290,000Public Benefit$112,500Philanthropy$78,400Youth Development$50,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $235,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $78,400 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCongaree Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $10,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLeap Learning Systems: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBLUFFTON SELF HELP INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEA PINES FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Congaree Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Leap Learning Systems ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUFFTON SELF HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEA PINES FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heritage Classic FoundationSC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heritage Classic Foundation · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · The Marshall Miller Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kilrea Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kilrea Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kilrea’s filings →

    More from the funding graph