Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kei Lin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$501kFood & Nutrition$174kReligion$103kHousing & Shelter$25kEmployment$15kEducation$8kHealth$6k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS$30,000
SOLVANG SENIOR CENTER$25,000
BUELLTON SENIOR CENTER$25,000
LOS ALAMOS VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS O$20,000
SERVANTS AT WORK INC$20,000
VALLEY HAVEN$20,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING$20,000
ATTERDAG AT HOME$15,000
SANTA BARBARA MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
HIDDEN WINGS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
PILGRIM TERRACE COOPERATIVE HOMES$15,000
ATTERDAG VILLAGE OF SOLVANG$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ADVOCACY FOR RESPECT & CHOICE: $26k → 14%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $20k → 16%SOLVANG FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $20k → 14%SOLVANG FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING: $20k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$622k · 14 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +113% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$622k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
-19%

Still filing today

29%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ATTERDAG AT HOME INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +140%
  • SF
    Solvang Friendship House
    2× · 2023–2024 · $36k · revenue +18%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • AF
    Advocacy for Respect and Choice- Long Beach Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue -19%
  • SY
    SANTA YNEZ VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATIONS (BUELLTON SENIOR CENTER)
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • US
    UNITY SHOPPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Home for the Aged
—
2
Friendship Adult Day Care Center Inc

To provide adult day services for individuals living with dementia, offering a safe, enriching environment while providing respite for family caregivers. Friendship Center provides caregiver support services, offering guidance and…

Human Services
3
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
4
San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society
Health
5
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
6
Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services
7
Star Developmental Services Inc

Offering compassionate and convenient in-home respite care for disabled loved ones and supportive living solutions in north county san diego.

Human Services
8
Job Haines Home for Aged People
—
9
Caps of Santa Barbara Inc

Lifetime assistance services for persons with developmental disabilities

—
10
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Farmington Home for Aged People
—
12
Quality Care Home Facilities

Engaged in the activities to provide elderly personal homes supporting the elderly.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners in Caring; the most unlike its peers is The Rona Barrett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOLVANG SENIOR CENTER: $109,943 · OtherSOLVANG SENIOR CENTERVALLEY HAVEN: $90,943 · OtherVALLEY HAVENBUELLTON SENIOR CENTER: $85,942 · OtherBUELLTON SENIOR CENTERBETHANIA LUTHERAN CHURCH: $77,992 · OtherBETHANIA LUTHERAN CHURCHATTERDAG VILLAGE OF SOLVANG: $35,000 · OtherATTERDAG VILLAGE OF SOLVANGIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLos Alamos Valley Senior Citizens Inc: $20,000 · Other+12 more: $101,400 · Other+12 moreSolvang Friendship House: $36,000 · Human ServicesSolvang Friends…Advocacy for Respect and Choice- Long Beach Inc: $25,942 · Human ServicesAdvocacy for Re…Servants at Work Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesServants at Wor…COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTN…UNITY SHOPPE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITY SHOPPE IN…ATTERDAG AT HOME INC: $69,943 · Food & NutritionATTERDAG AT …SANTA BARBARA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSANTA BARBAR…WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS INC: $30,000 · Public BenefitHIDDEN WINGS: $15,000 · HealthPILGRIM TERRACE COOPERATIVE HOMES: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$551,220Human Services$111,942Food & Nutrition$89,943Public Benefit$30,000Health$15,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY HAVEN: $90,943 over 7y, 20% of budgetATTERDAG AT HOME INC: $69,943 over 6y, 10.0% of budgetSolvang Friendship House: $36,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAdvocacy for Respect and Choice- Long Beach Inc: $25,942 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLos Alamos Valley Senior Citizens Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetHIDDEN WINGS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPILGRIM TERRACE COOPERATIVE HOMES: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUNITY SHOPPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetADVENTURES IN CARING FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds ATTERDAG AT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Solvang Friendship House ↗
  • Who funds WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Advocacy for Respect and Choice- Long Beach Inc ↗
  • Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARING ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Los Alamos Valley Senior Citizens Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN WINGS ↗
  • Who funds PILGRIM TERRACE COOPERATIVE HOMES ↗
  • Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rona Barrett Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURES IN CARING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wood-Claeyssens FoundationCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kei Lin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kei Lin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kei Lin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kei Lin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kei Lin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph