Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Keenan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$345k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of The Keenan Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Keenan Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $345k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
6
’18
5
’19
8
’20
10
’21
9
’22
7
’23
13
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MRecreation & Sports$1.7MCommunity Improvement$715kAnimals$410kHealth$188kPublic Safety & Disaster$140kPhilanthropy$125kReligion$93kOther$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARINE CORPS LAW ENFORCEMENT FDTN$100,000
ARBOR BROTHERS INC$100,000
GAUCHOS$50,000
IONA PREPATORY SCHOOL$50,000
PART OF THE SOLUTION$15,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$5,000
SPECIAL OPERATIORS TRANSITION FDTN$2,500
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GOOD SHEPHARD: $100k → 9%GOOD SHEPHARD: $10k → 9%THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $10k → 8%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $5k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $5k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $3k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $3k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $3k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $3k → 9%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 21 repeat orgs$708k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$1.8M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+30%

Still filing today

62%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING
    8× · 2017–2024 · $715k · revenue +187%
  • TG
    THE GOOD SHEPHARD INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $110k · revenue +3%
  • UL
    US LACROSSE INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $76k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +89%
  • TF
    TEAMWORK FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • LC
    LADY CHOZ INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Row New York Inc

Through the discipline of rowing and rigorous academic support, row new york transforms the lives of new yorkers, regardless of background or ability.

Recreation & Sports
2
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Harlem Lacrosse and Leadership Corporation

Harlem lacrosse's mission is to empower the children who are most at risk for academic decline and dropout to rise above their challenges and reach their full potential. harlem lacrosse inspires children to dream about tomorrow while…

Recreation & Sports
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
11
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Heights Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rye Youth Athletic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,037,395 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac+4 more: $117,500 · EducationGOOD SHEPARD SERVICES: $410,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPARD SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…MARINE CORPS LAW ENFORCEMENT FDTN: $100,000 · OtherMARINE CORPS LAW ENFORC…GAUCHOS: $80,000 · OtherGAUCHOSFRIENDS OF HARVARD WOMEN'S SOCCER: $70,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HARVARD WOME…IONA PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherMCLEF: $50,000 · OtherFOHS: $50,000 · Other+21 more: $225,000 · Other+21 moreARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $715,000 · PhilanthropyARBOR BROTHERS I…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUND…RYE YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEAMWORK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE GOOD SHEPHARD INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUS LACROSSE INC: $76,000 · Recreation & SportsLADY CHOZ INC: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsPART OF THE SOLUTION: $65,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$3,154,895Other$1,135,000Philanthropy$790,000Youth Development$195,000Human Services$141,000Recreation & Sports$103,500Food & Nutrition$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,037,395 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $715,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetRYE YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE GOOD SHEPHARD INC: $110,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetUS LACROSSE INC: $76,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMWORK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLADY CHOZ INC: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKindness Cville: $20,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDocumenting Hope Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES MERE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING ↗
  • Who funds RYE YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD SHEPHARD INC ↗
  • Who funds US LACROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEAMWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LADY CHOZ INC ↗
  • Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Kindness Cville ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Documenting Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Heffernan Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Keenan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Keenan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keenan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph