Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Karafin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$517k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$1.7MEducation$269kPhilanthropy$203kInternational$98kReligion$4kHealth$4kEnvironment$1kArts & Culture$495Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $440k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$160,000
FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF$145,000
AMERICAN EDUCATION FUND$135,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILA$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA$20,000
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$1,950
JINSA$1,000
FREIRE FOUNDATION$1,000
JCHAI$1,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,000
MARIE SELBY BOTANICAL GARDENS$500
BARNES FOUNDATION$495
Individual grant recipient$200
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JCHAI: $1k → 10%JCHAI: $500 → 10%JCHAI: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 15 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$2.9M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+48%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $460k · revenue +44%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +164%
  • JC
    JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SK
    SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • JL
    JEWISH LEARNING VENTUREgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
The Jerusalem Connection
—
4
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
9
Foundation for Middle East Peace
Philanthropy
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
12
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is Naemt Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AJC GLOBAL JEWISH ADVOCACY: $800,000 · OtherAJC GLOBAL JEWISH ADVOCACYIndividual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF: $450,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OFAMERICAN EDUCATION FUND: $260,000 · OtherAMERICAN EDUCATION FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILA: $150,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILA+11 more: $60,435 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $460,200 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH CO…MIDDLE EAST FORUM: $65,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $30,000 · International+2 more: $3,250 · InternationalTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationFREIRE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $2,000 · Human ServicesThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $495 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,320,435Civil Rights$460,200International$98,250Education$9,000Human Services$2,000Environment$1,000Arts & Culture$495

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $460,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREIRE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $495 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH LEARNING VENTURE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAEMT Foundation: $100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FREIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNING VENTURE ↗
  • Who funds NAEMT Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Karafin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Karafin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Karafin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Karafin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karafin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph