Skip to content
The Junior League of San Francisco Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Junior League of San Francisco Inc

The association of junior leagues international is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$266kEducation$166kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$81kHousing & Shelter$66kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $50,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,691 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,691 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORENCE FANG COMMUNITY FARM (DBA ASIAN WEEK)$15,000
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$13,000
MAGIC TOOTHBUS$11,000
MAITRI COMPASSIONATE CARE$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%Janet Pomeroy Center: $35k → 10%MAGIC TOOTHBUS: $11k → 10%NEXT VILLAGE SF: $5k → 10%ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%Raphael House of SF: $32k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$599k · 9 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$599k
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+39%

Still filing today

78%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SAFE & SOUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $243k · revenue +81%
  • SM
    SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $148k · revenue +66%
  • PO
    Project Open Hand
    2× · 2018–2019 · $54k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • PR
    Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Centergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +39%
  • RH
    RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue +50%
  • WS
    Walk San Francisco Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
3
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
4
Faces Sf

Our mission is to nurture, teach and empower children and families to transform their lives by providing critical assistance to low-income families with early childhood development, workforce training, school-age enrichment, and family…

Education
5
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
6
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
7
San Francisco Transit Riders

San Francisco Transit Riders is the city's rider-based grassroots advocate forworld-class transit. Together with our members we work for an excellent,affordable, and growing public transit system because it is essential to thecharacter and…

Community Improvement
8
Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—
9
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
10
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

—
11
San Francisco Family Foundation
—
12
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Florence Fang Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE & SOUND: $243,000 · OtherSAFE & SOUNDINSTITUTE ON AGING: $35,000 · OtherINSTITUTE ON AGINGBREAKTHROUGH SAN FRANCISCO: $24,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH SAN FRANCISCOMAITRI COMPASSIONATE CARE: $16,000 · Other+4 more: $25,000 · Other+4 moreSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $148,000 · EducationSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RE…THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $17,854 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABO…Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $35,000 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation an…COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $34,250 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY SERVIC…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $31,800 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN …MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $11,000 · Human ServicesMAGIC TOOTH BUSHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PRO…THE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAN FRANCISCO PAR…ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesASIANWEEK FOUNDATIONNorth East Exchange Team - San Francisco: $5,000 · Human ServicesProject Open Hand: $53,750 · Food & NutritionFLORENCE FANG FAMILY FOUNDATION: $27,000 · InternationalDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 · Civil RightsSan Francisco CASA: $10,000 · Civil RightsWalk San Francisco Foundation: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$343,000Education$165,854Human Services$145,050Food & Nutrition$53,750International$27,000Civil Rights$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE & SOUND: $243,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $148,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetProject Open Hand: $53,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $34,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $31,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $17,854 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAITRI COMPASSIONATE CARE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAGIC TOOTH BUS: $11,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWalk San Francisco Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSan Francisco CASA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOld Skool Cafe: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIP HOP FOR CHANGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNorth East Exchange Team - San Francisco: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLIONS CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…McNabb FoundationBothin FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Marin Community Found…Delta Dental Communit…Salesforce FoundationThe Yelp FoundationAbbVie FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…
The San Francisco FoundationCA23.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Junior League of San Francisco Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Junior League of San Francisco Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Junior League of San Francisco’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home