How much did THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC grant in FY2025?

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC reported 13 grants totaling $195,438 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC based?

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC is based in TX.

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC

The junior league of austin is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

$195k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$356kArts & Culture$202kEducation$86kHealth$81kCommunity Improvement$80kCrime & Legal$72kAnimals$59kEnvironment$53kReligion$51kOther$341k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

abused neglectedneglected childrenbasiccarecreaterescueadults

2020

meetabused neglectedfreefindhealthsafeeducational

2021

healthyinspireyoutheducationalanimalsrescueanimal

2022

schedulingonlinedatabaserainbow roomcraftstaffcoordinator

2023

schedulingonlinedatabaserainbow roomcraftcoordinatorstaff

2024

milkbirthday boxchild abusecoordinatorsuppliesdance educationstudents ages

2025

experiencechildren fosterfoster careconservationignitejoyhumane

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k10 grants · $81k
$10k–50k3 grants · $30k

$9,000

Median grant

States reached

$28M

Total assets

Largest grants

WOMEN'S STORYBOOK PROJECT$10,000
ZACH SCOTT THEATRE CENTER$10,000
AUSTIN HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
BALLET AUSTIN$9,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$9,000
AUSTIN CREATIVE REUSE$9,000
SUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER INC$9,000
MOTHER'S MILK BANK$9,000
AUSTIN ZOO$9,000
FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$7,000
POP-UP BIRTHDAY$7,000
WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER$7,000
GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $248k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 32 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+26%

Still filing today

94%

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DF
DRESS FOR SUCCESS
7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +169%
BA
BALLET AUSTIN
7× · 2019–2025 · $67k · revenue +27%
RM
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CENTRAL TEXAS
6× · 2018–2024 · $63k · revenue +136%

Funded once

AS
AUSTIN SMILESgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +106%
TS
THE SALVATION ARMY
one grant, 2018 · $16k
GS
GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS
one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development

Austin Street Center

Austin street center provides emergency shelter and related services to the homeless.

—

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

Texprotects-the Texas Association for

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development

Casa of Central Texas Inc

Advocates for children

Civil Rights

Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin's mission is to prevent and end homelessness in greater austin.

—

Texas Casa Inc

To promote and develop local court-appointed special advocates programs throughout texas.

Civil Rights

Austin Child Guidance Center

To improve the mental health of children and their families through early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment to help them develop the emotional skills for meeting life's challenges.

—

Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

With a focus on child development, any baby can provides in-home therapy (physical, speech, occupational), parent education, mental health counseling, medical case management, resource navigation and other family support services.

—

Austin Community Law Center

The Austin Community Law Center is a nonprofit law firm. Our mission is to make legal representation radically more affordable, invest in a stronger community, and fight for justice.

Crime & Legal

Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

The children's aid society of west texas operates a custodial child care and teen runaway shelter. its mission is to provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve…

Human Services

Austin Theatre Alliance

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Generation Serve and the most unlike its peers is Mothers' Milk Bank At Austin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/45

the rest of the field

11%

956/8,906

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

42/42

Grantees still filing

36/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$356,100Other$503,920Arts & Culture$201,700Education$86,000Health$80,687Community Improvement$79,740Crime & Legal$71,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX63.6× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Topfer Family Foundation · Better Business Bureau · United Way Worldwide · The Moody Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · The Applied Materials Foundation · Central Texas Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · I Live Here I Give Here

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE SALVATION ARMY AUSTIN AREA COMMAND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 742446170 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE SALVATION ARMY AUSTIN AREA COMMAND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Junior League of Austin Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Junior League of Austin Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Junior League of Austin Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Junior League of Austin Inc?

More from the funding graph