Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$3.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Detroit, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
8
19
6
20
7
21
9
22
10
23
8
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$3.3MPhilanthropy$1.9MHealth$405kHuman Services$155kScience & Tech$94kInternational$37kFood & Nutrition$24kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.3M
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE SHIR SHALOM$3,006,485
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$300,500
HEART 2 HART DETROIT$25,000
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$19,500
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE$10,000
HADASSAH$8,500
GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT$6,000
DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION$5,085
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $25k → 8%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $25k → 8%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $25k → 8%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $10k → 8%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $10k → 8%HEART 2 HART DETROIT: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
VA
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 18 repeat orgs$405k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$3.5M
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+17%

Still filing today

61%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +54%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +83%
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • BH
    Beaumont Health
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +87%
  • BH
    BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -67%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

7
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
10
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
11
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
12
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Gilda's Club Metro Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEMPLE SHIR SHALOM — $3,215,765 · OtherTEMPLE SHIR SHALOM+15 more — $167,100 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $1,883,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT+3 more — $34,480 · PhilanthropyBeaumont Health — $250,000 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Health+3 more — $15,050 · HealthHEART 2 HART DETROIT INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $93,500 · InternationalGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC — $5,085 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $8,600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,382,865Philanthropy$1,917,980Health$365,050Human Services$111,000International$93,500Arts & Culture$30,085Education$15,000Food & Nutrition$8,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $1,883,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBeaumont Health — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART 2 HART DETROIT INC — $100,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $93,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $25,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYAD EZRA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $9,480 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $8,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC — $7,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC — $5,085 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds Beaumont Health
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEART 2 HART DETROIT INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YAD EZRA
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC
  • Who funds SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The June and Robert Gurwin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph