Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Judith and Craven Williams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$17kHuman Services$4kEducation$4kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$850Employment$100Housing & Shelter$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
4
States reached
$196k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saint Francis Epicopal Church$5,450
Welspring Gratitude Fund$1,000
Friends with Flowers$500
St Mark's Episcopal Church$500
Holy Trinity Episcopal Church$200
A Simple Gesture$200
Union Presbyterian Seminary$100
Out of the Garden Project$100
First Presbyterian Church$100
Osage Education Fund$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Reeves Community Center Foundation: $1k → 17%The Interactive Resource Center: $100 → 16%Wellspring Retirement Community: $1k → 16%Wellspring Retirement Community: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
32

Total granted

$17k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+11%

Still filing today

25%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEmploymentRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    St Francis Episcopal Church
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k
  • MA
    Mount Airy City Schools
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k

Funded once

  • SF
    St Francis Epicopal Church
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
4
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
5
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
6
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
7
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
8
Greenwood Project

Greenwood's mission is to create career pathways in the financial services industry for black and latino college students. we partner with companies to find equitable and inclusive solutions for recruitment, retention, and advancement. our…

Human Services
9
Bennett College

To offer women an education conducive to excellence in scholarly pursuits, preparation for leadership roles in the workplace, society, and the world, and life-long learning in a technologically advanced, complex global society.

Education
10
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golf Fore Fun Inc; the most unlike its peers is Out of the Garden Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Francis Episcopal Church: $6,740 · OtherSt Francis Episcopal ChurchSAINT FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5,450 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $4,440 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Francis Epicopal Church: $2,650 · OtherSt Francis Epicopal ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMount Airy City Schools: $2,000 · OtherFRIENDS WITH FLOWERS INC: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,350 · Other+25 more: $8,840 · Other+25 moreWELL-SPRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesREEVES COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $100 · Human ServicesGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $600 · EducationAVERETT UNIVERSITY: $200 · EducationCHRIST SCHOOL INC: $100 · EducationA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $650 · Food & NutritionOUT OF THE GARDEN PROJECT: $100 · Food & NutritionREACH OUT FIRST INC: $100 · EmploymentGOLF FORE FUN INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsFELLOWSHIP HALL INC: $100 · Health
Other$39,120Human Services$2,200Education$900Food & Nutrition$750Employment$100Recreation & Sports$100Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELL-SPRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREEVES COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVERETT UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT FIRST INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST SCHOOL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FORE FUN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HALL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELL-SPRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds REEVES COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AVERETT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FORE FUN INC ↗
  • Who funds OUT OF THE GARDEN PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Betty J and Robert P Williams Family Foundation · The Stout Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Judith and Craven Williams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Judith and Craven Williams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Judith and Craven Williams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph