· Private foundation
The Joullian Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRINITY UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| CASADY SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY | $10,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNT | $10,000 |
| THE COLONIAL WILLAMSBURG FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TRINITY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| NICHOLS HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTrinity University4× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +62%
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $193k · revenue +27%- TCTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- WSWESTMINSTER SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +19%
TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -11%- OCOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The university of tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. guided by our commitment to diversity,…
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
As a christian liberal arts university, oklahoma baptist university transforms lives by equipping students to pursue academic excellence, integrate faith with all areas of knowledge, engage a diverse world, and live worthy of the high…
The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.
The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NOBLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE LLC ↗
- Who funds NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY GEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SISU YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds DIABETES SOLUTION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Bowen Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Joullian Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.