How much did THE JOSEPH TREADWELL CHARITABLE FDN grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of THE JOSEPH TREADWELL CHARITABLE FDN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

foodcaringaid

2023

foodchild advocacyaid

2024

aidvisitation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $36k
$10k–50k16 grants · $306k
$50k–250k4 grants · $335k
$250k+1 grant · $298k

$10,226

Median grant

States reached

$14M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA$297,886
UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE$124,499
THE VISITATION MONASTERY$111,000
ST MARGARET OF SCOTLAND$50,000
CAMP RAP-A-HOPE$50,000
DRUG EDUCATION COUNCIL INC$35,000
SPRING HILL COLLEGE$32,912
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$32,652
THE LEARNING TREE$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$26,880
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$25,000
EASTERN SHORE REPERTORY THEATRE$22,500
THE SHOULDER OF THE CENTRAL GULF COAST$20,000
THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,510
COASTAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,226

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.8M · 30 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.8M

$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+61%

Still filing today

50%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE
4× · 2021–2024 · $239k · revenue +13%
DE
DRUG EDUCATION COUNCIL INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $215k · revenue +25%
TL
THE LEARNING TREE
4× · 2021–2024 · $87k · revenue +37%

Funded once

KO
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
one grant, 2023 · $25k
GG
GOODWILL GULF COAST
one grant, 2023 · $25k
WH
WILMER HALL
one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc

The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.

Human Services

Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center

Coordinate the community's response to child abuse in Shelby County, AL.

Crime & Legal

Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal

Rebuilding Together of South Al

Repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuilding lives.

Housing & Shelter

The Arc of Central Alabama Inc

Serving people with intellectual and/or other developmental disabilities and their families.

—

Community Kitchens of Birmingham

Assistance to homeless and needy persons.

Food & Nutrition

Girl Scouts of North Central Alabama

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

—

Alabama Association of Nonprofits

To strengthen the capacity of alabama's nonprofit sector through professional development, advocacy, and management support, all resulting in better communities and a stronger alabama.

Human Services

The Arc of Southwest Alabama Inc

Provides training for adults with developmental disabilities in an adult training setting and supervised alternative living arrangements for washington county, alabama

Human Services

Alabama Waldorf Association

Alabama Waldorf School is a community dedicated to educating responsible world citizens, beginning at age 1.5 in the nursery and continuing through grade 8.

—

University Charter School

Operation of a public charter school in Livingston, AL.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding the Gulf Coast and the most unlike its peers is University of Mobile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

13%

356/2,776

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

16/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,283,449Education$344,354Health$195,510Arts & Culture$74,500Food & Nutrition$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,000Animals$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crampton Trust #1255000731AL29× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crampton Trust #1255000731 · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Mapp Family Foundation · J L Bedsole Foundation · Ws Foundation Inc · Cox Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Southwest Alabama Inc · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · The Hyman Foundation · The Robert and Joanna Cunningham · Baldwin County Electric Membership

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE JOSEPH TREADWELL CHARITABLE FDN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~77 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 631109256 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 77 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Joseph Treadwell Charitable Fdn?

Find your warmest path to The Joseph Treadwell Charitable Fdn through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE JOSEPH TREADWELL CHARITABLE FDN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Joseph Treadwell Charitable Fdn?

More from the funding graph

THE JOSEPH TREADWELL CHARITABLE FDN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Joseph Treadwell Charitable Fdn?

More from the funding graph