Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph Durda Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$189kHuman Services$45kRecreation & Sports$13kCrime & Legal$11kReligion$8kPublic Benefit$5kAnimals$4kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WELL DISABILITY SERVICES$10,000
RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION$5,000
LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC$5,000
MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$5,000
23RD VETERAN$2,500
MINNESOTA WILLS FOR HEROES$2,500
EVERY THIRD SATURDAY$2,500
RESOURCE WEST$2,000
CAST OUTDOOR ADVENTURES$2,000
NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY$2,000
CRESCENT COVE$2,000
PRAIRIE STAR CARE FARM$1,500
HELPING PAWS$1,000
BOLDER OPTIONS$1,000
DUNMAC GOLF FOR VETS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HELPING PAWS: $1k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $1k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $1k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $1k → 11%LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $5k → 6%LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $2k → 6%SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 11%LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $1k → 6%CRESCENT COVE: $3k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $3k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $2k → 11%HOMEWARD BOUND INC: $1k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$267k · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$267k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+28%

Still filing today

65%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    Living Well Disability Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +50%
  • MH
    MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +29%
  • CC
    CRESCENT COVE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • ML
    MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeward Bound Foundation

To support the charitable purposes of homeward bound, inc.

—
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Residential Services of Northeastern Minnesota Inc

Enhancing the lives of people with disabilities by providing innovative services that promote inclusion and self-determination.

Human Services
4
Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
5
Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.

—
6
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
7
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
8
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
9
Horizon Home Care & Hospice Inc

Horizon home care & hospice, inc. is a full-service provider offering a wide range of specialty services to meet the needs of patients in southeastern wisconsin. as an extension of a network of acute-care hospitals and other health care…

Health
10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
11
Richfield Living

Helping individuals experience life to the fullest, through every phase of their journey.

Health
12
Keystone Community Services

To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prairie Star Care Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Living Well Disability Services: $115,000 · OtherLiving Well Disability ServicesMINNESOTA WILLS FOR HEROES: $10,500 · OtherMINNESOTA WILLS FOR HEROESMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETS: $10,000 · OtherMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETSUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $8,000 · OtherUS ELECTRIC WHEELCHAIR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Other+9 more: $29,000 · Other+9 moreMINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $41,000 · HealthMINNEAPOLIS HEART …Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $4,000 · HealthGillette Children'…JOY COLLABORATIVE: $3,000 · HealthJOY COLLABORATIVE+1 more: $1,000 · HealthCRESCENT COVE: $16,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COV…LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesLIFEWORKS SE…HELPING PAWS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesHELPING PAWS…SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 · Human ServicesHammer Residences Inc: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesEVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC: $8,000 · Public Benefit23RD VETERAN: $4,500 · Public BenefitResourcewest: $6,500 · EducationNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationBolder Options: $2,000 · EducationRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $1,500 · PhilanthropyPRAIRIE STAR CARE FARM: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsCIRCLE OF DISCIPLINE INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TWIN CITIES FOUNDATION: $500 · Youth Development
Other$179,000Health$49,000Human Services$32,000Public Benefit$12,500Education$12,500Philanthropy$6,500Recreation & Sports$3,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLiving Well Disability Services: $115,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $16,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetResourcewest: $6,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budget23RD VETERAN: $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOY COLLABORATIVE: $3,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBolder Options: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF DISCIPLINE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHammer Residences Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAJESTIC HILLS RANCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TWIN CITIES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Living Well Disability Services ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Resourcewest ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 23RD VETERAN ↗
  • Who funds HELPING PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JOY COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Bolder Options ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STAR CARE FARM ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF DISCIPLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hammer Residences Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MAJESTIC HILLS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TWIN CITIES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN30.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Tradition Family Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The James M Stanton Foundation · Russell T Lund Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph Durda Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph Durda Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joseph Durda Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Joseph Durda Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Durda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph