Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$23kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$12kReligion$5kEducation$3kCrime & Legal$400Arts & Culture$250Animals$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$975
Median grant
4
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT$14,500
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK$7,500
CHILDREN MIRACLE NETWORK$7,500
DIOCESE OF HARRISBURG$4,700
INDIGENT PERSON 8$981
INDIGENT PERSON 15$975
INDIGENT PERSON 3$975
INDIGENT PERSON 6$600
INDIGENT PERSON 11$600
INDIGENT PERSON 12$300
THE 521 CLUB INC$100
AMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC$100
LITITZ CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$75
COLEL CHABAD$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%RED LION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $125 → 10%INDIGENT PERSON 12: $655 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 3: $996 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 15: $993 → 12%CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $8k → 12%INDIGENT PERSON 7: $350 → 7%CHILDREN MIRACLE NETWORK: $8k → 8%TURNING POINT: $15k → 16%INDIGENT PERSON 1: $400 → 11%ST HEDWIG CHURCH: $250 → 10%INDIGENT PERSON 13: $160 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 3: $975 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 15: $975 → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $250 → 12%INDIGENT PERSON 7: $350 → 7%INDIGENT PERSON 1: $400 → 11%ST ELIZABETH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $250 → 10%2ND CHANCE FOR LIFE RESCUE: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 10: $795 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 13: $827 → 12%DIOCESE OF HARRISBURG: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $500 → 10%TENFOLD: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 3: $780 → 9%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $500 → 10%TENFOLD: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 10: $610 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $500 → 10%INDIGENT PERSON 3: $350 → 9%THE 521 CLUB INC: $300 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 14: $600 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 5: $225 → 9%THE BAINBRIDGE BAND: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 8: $981 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 8: $981 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 8: $980 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON9: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON9: $250 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 6: $865 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 6: $600 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 6: $600 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 11: $862 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 14: $713 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 12: $650 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 11: $600 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 12: $300 → 9%INDIGENT PERSON 2: $549 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 15 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$21k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

13%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    INDIGENT PERSON 3
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k
  • IP
    INDIGENT PERSON 8
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k
  • IP
    INDIGENT PERSON 6
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k

Funded once

  • IP
    INDIGENT PERSON 2
    one grant, 2022 · $549
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDINGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +50%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
4
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…

—
5
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
6
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
7
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
10
Lancaster Country Day School

The mission of lancaster country day school is to empower students to explore their passions, find purpose, and become the best versions of themselves.

Education
11
Chester County Hospital & Health System

The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.

Health
12
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $7,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKDIOCESE OF HARRISBURG: $4,700 · OtherDIOCESE OF HARRISBURGINDIGENT PERSON 3: $3,101 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 3INDIGENT PERSON 8: $2,942 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 8INDIGENT PERSON 6: $2,065 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 6INDIGENT PERSON 15: $1,968 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 15INDIGENT PERSON 12: $1,605 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 11: $1,562 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1,500 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 10: $1,405 · OtherINDIGENT PERSON 14: $1,313 · Other+14 more: $5,961 · Other+14 moreTurning Point Inc: $14,500 · HealthTurning Point Inc+2 more: $750 · HealthCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PENNSY…RED LION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC F/K/A REACH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $125 · EducationLITITZ CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $75 · EducationAMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$35,622Health$15,250Food & Nutrition$7,500Education$200Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTurning Point Inc: $14,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTENFOLD: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITITZ CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
  • Who funds TENFOLD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RED LION CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC F/K/A REACH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITITZ CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph and Eleanor Piascinski’s filings →

More from the funding graph