Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$75kPhilanthropy$33kEducation$13kReligion$5kArts & Culture$4kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,215
Median grant
1
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH SHOLOM B'NAI ISRAEL$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD$5,000
OTHER CONTRIBUTION TO ORGANIZED CHARITIES$3,215
GENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%MCC FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%GENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 13 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$87k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+74%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Hartford Hospital
    3× · 2017–2020 · $50k · revenue +112%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +123%
  • TC
    THE CHESHIRE ACADEMY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • HR
    HAAKON RAGDE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • MF
    MCC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +79%
  • TA
    THE ARTHIRITS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manchester Academic Charter School
Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Manchester Historical Society Inc

The manchester historical society educates the public about the history of manchester, connecticut; collects, preserves, interprets, and exhibits information and artifacts about the town and its diverse population, and advocates for the…

Arts & Culture
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Manchester Early Learning Center

Child day care. the organization provides childcare services for children ages 3-12 years. each program complies with the state of connecticut licensing requirements which requires that each program be staffed by qualified teachers and…

Human Services
6
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
7
Manchester Historic Association

To collect and preserve materials relating to the history of manchester, new hampshire, and to operate a museum, research center, and educational programs relating to this history for the benefit of the public.

—
8
Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Connecticut children's medical center is dedicated to improving the physical and emotional health of children through family-centered care, research, education and advocacy. we embrace discovery, teamwork, integrity and excellence in all…

Health
9
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Theatre of Manchester Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hartford Hospital: $50,000 · HealthHartford HospitalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $16,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $30,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREA…THE CHESHIRE ACADEMY: $6,000 · OtherTHE CHESHIRE ACADEMYBETH SHOLOM B'NAI ISRAEL: $5,000 · OtherBETH SHOLOM B'NAI ISRAE…HAAKON RAGDE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherHAAKON RAGDE FOUNDATIONOTHER CONTRIBUTION TO ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $3,215 · OtherOTHER CONTRIBUTION TO O…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…EAST CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $1,500 · OtherEAST CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO…Individual grant recipient: $1,150 · OtherTHE ARTHIRITS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherST JAMES SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $1,000 · Other+7 more: $1,890 · Other+7 moreMANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationLUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE THEATRE OF MANCHESTER INC: $500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 · Arts & CultureMCC FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesGENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMARC INC OF MANCHESTER: $1,150 · Employment
Health$66,500Philanthropy$30,000Other$27,755Education$4,000Arts & Culture$2,700Human Services$2,500Employment$1,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHartford Hospital: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHESHIRE ACADEMY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMCC FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARC INC OF MANCHESTER: $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE THEATRE OF MANCHESTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAST INC: $90 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hartford Hospital ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHESHIRE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTZ CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MCC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC OF MANCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE LOVE DIAPER PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE THEATRE OF MANCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CAST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sbm Charitable Foundation IncCT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Highland Park Families Foundation · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Marc Inc of Manchester: 89% of income from government
  • Lutz Children's Museum Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Cast Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jonathan George Ellis Leukemia’s filings →

More from the funding graph