Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2019
63
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$632k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

66% of The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to California Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 33 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 26 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

31
’17
28
’18
26
’19
22
’20
23
’21
29
’22
17
’23
33
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$8.3MEducation$6.4MScience & Tech$3.7MArts & Culture$1.0MPublic Benefit$288kSocial Science$261kRecreation & Sports$240kCommunity Improvement$198kOther$0
02FY2019 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k28 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $646k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $219k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$632,257
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$387,009
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE$339,697
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$266,163
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY$95,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$72,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$52,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS$47,840
THE JOHN RANDOLPH HAYNES & DORA HAYNES FOUNDATION$45,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$40,000
POMONA COLLEGE$38,550
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$34,577
ECONOMIC ROUNDTABLE$28,800
THE JOHN RANDOLPH HAYNES & DORA HAYNES FOUNDATION$25,530
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%CASA DE AMISTAD: $5k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 60 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2019, 19 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
5

Total granted

$8.1M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+144%

Still filing today

55%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $646k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
  • POMONA COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $226k · revenue +109%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOOD FORWARD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +483%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • UF
    UCLA FOWLER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
California State University Los Angeles Alumni Association Inc

To foster relationships among alumni, students and community by providing services and activities that build loyalty, support and a lifelong connection to the university.

—
8
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
9
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State University Los Angeles Auxiliary Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/72
Grantees still filing
47/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,960,859 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+4 more: $256,588 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $1,907,507 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGEL…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $968,510 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDEUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $417,094 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINEUCLA: $242,266 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $239,400 · Other+80 more: $2,581,199 · Other+80 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,885,516 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALI…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,026,809 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TEC…POMONA COLLEGE: $225,634 · EducationClaremont Graduate University: $175,616 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $175,000 · Education+18 more: $539,874 · Education+18 moreCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $162,500 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $140,558 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $137,800 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $110,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $91,000 · Arts & CultureEBELL OF LOS ANGELES: $47,563 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $38,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $685 · Arts & CultureThe Rand Corporation: $74,800 · Public BenefitAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: $40,000 · Public BenefitNational Academy of Public Administration: $25,000 · Public BenefitCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $25,000 · Public Benefit+2 more: $7,500 · Public BenefitNorthwestern University: $78,750 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $50,000 · Social ScienceVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $25,000 · Social Science
Philanthropy$8,217,447Other$6,355,976Education$5,028,449Arts & Culture$728,606Public Benefit$172,300Recreation & Sports$78,750Social Science$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,960,859 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,885,516 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1,026,809 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $225,634 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Achievement Trust Foundation: $205,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $175,616 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $162,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetECONOMIC ROUNDTABLE: $158,400 over 4y, 30% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $156,635 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $140,558 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $137,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $93,153 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $91,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $78,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $74,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $71,528 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $67,852 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $66,300 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetClaremont McKenna College: $60,831 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS: $60,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAS MADRINAS: $55,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEBELL OF LOS ANGELES: $47,563 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEASTERN SIERRA LAND TRUST: $40,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $38,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPitzer College: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHERP INC: $25,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetFriends of the Inyo: $25,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNational Academy of Public Administration: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOWN HALL LOS ANGELES: $21,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PUEBLO PARK ASSOCIATION: $11,513 over 2y, 43% of budgetNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANDID: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Achievement Trust Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN RANDOLPH HAYNES AND DORA HAYNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA40.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph