· Private foundation
The John J and Lillian M Taylor Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $219k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $24,000 |
| NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $23,000 |
| NEWPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY | $13,200 |
| PAN MASS CHALLENGE | $13,000 |
| COX SCIENCE CENTER AND AQUARIUM | $11,000 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS | $10,000 |
| YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| SAIL TO PREVAIL | $10,000 |
| THE PALM BEACH POLICE & FIRE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RDK MELANOMA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC7× · 2017–2023 · $303k · revenue +165%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +129%
- NCNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2024 · $141k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- MFMORSELIFE FOUNDATION GENDELMAN TREEone grant, 2021 · $50k
- LCLEE COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2022 · $25k
- ADALEXIS DE TOXQUIVILLE SOCIETY UNITED WAYone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
See Disclosure Above.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leaving Legacies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SAIL NEWPORT ↗
- Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Newport Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SAIL TO PREVAIL ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alletta Morris McBean Charitable Trust · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamilton Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · R Dudley Harrington Jr Char Fdn · Lyn & Margaret Comfort Charitable Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The John J and Lillian M Taylor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Gulf Stream Council of Boy Scouts of America Inc — 9% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Center for Creative Education — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Community Boating Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The John J and Lillian M Taylor Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The John J and Lillian M Taylor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.