Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John F Nagel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$224k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.7MYouth Development$1.1MHealth$1.0MHuman Services$677kArts & Culture$444kCrime & Legal$210kHousing & Shelter$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $193k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
$60,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO$224,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$200,000
ST LUKE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$125,000
Individual grant recipient$106,960
WARHAWK AIR MUSEUM$90,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY$75,000
SALVATION ARMY OF ADA COUNTY$60,500
WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$60,000
IDAHO DIABETES YOUTH PROGRAMS - CAMP HODIA$60,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BOISE$60,000
FACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION$60,000
BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF SW IDAHO$54,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$47,500
CHILDREN'S FREE DENTAL CLINIC INC$40,000
JAYDEN DELUCA FOUNDATION$32,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $60k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $60k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $58k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $58k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 20 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$5.4M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+32%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +43%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY SPIRIT CONFERENCE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $209k · revenue +16% · 30% of their budget
  • JD
    Jayden DeLuca Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $110k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TC
    The College of Idaho Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +32%
  • PB
    PATHS - BISHOP KELLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boundary County Historical Society Inc

Museum

Arts & Culture
2
Sandpoint Charter School

To provide alternate educational opportunities for Idaho children.

Education
3
Friends of the Salt Lake County Children's Justice Center

Support salt lake county children's justice center

Philanthropy
4
Boys and Girls Clubs of Southeast Idaho Inc

To inspire and enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens in the southeast idaho area.

Youth Development
5
Exchange Club of Spokane Foundation

Prevention of child abuse

—
6
Children's Safety Center

Child abuse victim assistance

Crime & Legal
7
Boys & Girls Club of Jefferson County

Provide a safe place for youth to go for recreational and educational programs.

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club of Las Cruces

Recreation youth development

Youth Development
9
Columbia Gorge Childrens Advocacy Center

Operation of a children's advocacy center

Crime & Legal
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Lewis Clark Valley Inc Endowment Trust

Hold funds and distribute income to the boys & girls club of the lewis clark valley, inc, a non-profit idaho corporation.

Youth Development
11
Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and the Blind Foundation Inc

To promote, ensure & maintain excellent & comprehensive educational opportunities for the children and youth served by Idaho Educational Services for the Deaf and Blind from birth to 26 years of age across the state of Idaho.

Unclassified
12
Boys & Girls Club of Utah County Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from diverse circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens and leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Ada Co Id; the most unlike its peers is Society of Saint Vincent De Paul Holy Spirit Conference. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO: $826,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHOBOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · OtherBOISE STATE UNIVERSITYST LUKE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $625,000 · OtherST LUKE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $459,840 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BOISE: $240,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BOISESALVATION ARMY OF ADA COUNTY: $232,900 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF ADA COUNTYBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF SW IDAHO: $215,760 · OtherFACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $210,350 · OtherIDAHO DIABETES YOUTH PROGRAMS - CAMP HODIA: $210,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY SPIRIT CONFERENCE: $208,500 · Other+2 more: $58,000 · OtherWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC: $364,500 · Arts & CultureWARHAWK A…Children's Museum of Idaho Inc: $59,927 · Arts & CultureChildren'…FOUNDATION FOR IDAHO HISTORY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentChildrens Free Dental Clinic Inc: $160,000 · HealthJayden DeLuca Foundation Inc: $110,100 · HealthTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · HealthWomen's and Children's Alliance: $236,000 · Human ServicesTHE MENTORING NETWORK INC: $97,400 · EducationThe College of Idaho Inc: $80,000 · Education
Other$4,086,350Arts & Culture$444,427Youth Development$340,000Health$282,100Human Services$236,000Education$177,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC: $364,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID: $300,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $236,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY SPIRIT CONFERENCE: $208,500 over 4y, 30% of budgetChildrens Free Dental Clinic Inc: $160,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetJayden DeLuca Foundation Inc: $110,100 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetTHE MENTORING NETWORK INC: $97,400 over 4y, 13% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Museum of Idaho Inc: $59,927 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR IDAHO HISTORY: $20,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARHAWK AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY SPIRIT CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Free Dental Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jayden DeLuca Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MENTORING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Museum of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR IDAHO HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Bews Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Union Pacific Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John F Nagel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John F Nagel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John F Nagel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The John F Nagel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John F Nagel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph