Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John and Lucille Pianfetti Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$290kArts & Culture$272kRecreation & Sports$181kEducation$171kHousing & Shelter$131kFood & Nutrition$78kEnvironment$64kCivil Rights$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $230k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holler Health$30,000
THE TAMARACK FOUNDATION$30,000
EXPERIENCE LEARNING$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON$25,000
WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT$25,000
COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT$25,000
Mountaineer Food Bank$18,530
FAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA$15,000
APPALACHIAN EXPEDITIONS$14,200
CHARLESTON DISTANCE RUN FOUNDATION$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Ken Ellis Memorial Park$8,000
Warner Drive-In Cultural Resource C$7,500
Celtic Arts Foundation$6,000
Friends of the Hot Springs Library$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
OH
CA
KY
WV
VA
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 31 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$6k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +481%
  • TF
    TAMARACK FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +92%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • PC
    Pendleton County Farmers Market
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE DISASTER RELIEF
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • UU
    UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Appalachian Investment Corporation

Appalachian investment corporation works to increase economic activity in the appalachian counties of kentucky.

—
2
Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project

To help local farms thrive, link farmers to markets and supporters, and build healthy communities through connections to local food.

Environment
3
EcoForesters

Restoring and conserving our Appalachian forests through education and stewarship.

Environment
4
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
5
Backroads of Appalachia

Backroads of appalachia is a non-profit organization with a mission to provide new economic opportunities within the communities of eastern kentucky and southwest virginia.

Community Improvement
6
West Virginia University Foundation Inc

The mission of the WVU Foundation is to enrich the lives of those touched by West Virginia University by maximizing charitable support and providing services to the University, its students and affiliated organizations.

Education
7
Appalachian Voices

Appalachian voices brings people together to protect the land, air, and water of central and southern appalachia and advance a just transition to a generative and equitable clean energy economy.

Environment
8
Afl-Cio Appalachian Council Inc

Job training and development

—
9
Fairness Wv Institute Inc

Provide education and grassroots advocacy about issues of importance to lgbt west virginians.

Civil Rights
10
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
11
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks Inc

The organization is a community based economic development entity serving the 32 counties of appalachia ohio. its mission is to build the capacity of appalachian communities to network, work together and innovate to create a dynamic…

Community Improvement
12
Generation West Virginia Inc

Generation wv is the statewide organization dedicated to attracting, retaining, and advancing young talent in the mountain state. generation west virginia equips young west virginians with key skills and career opportunities, ensuring…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yew Mountain Center; the most unlike its peers is Coalfield Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $160,000 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCHoller Health: $130,000 · OtherHoller HealthCHARLESTON DISTANCE RUN FOUNDATION: $62,350 · OtherCHARLESTON DISTANCE RUN FOUNDATIONWarner Drive-In Cultural Resource C: $52,250 · OtherWarner Drive-In Cultural Resource CKANAWHA COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $34,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S THEATER OF CHARLESTON: $25,423 · OtherMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $38,530 · Other+25 more: $220,604 · Other+25 moreTAMARACK FOUNDATION INC: $130,350 · Arts & CultureTAMARACK FOU…CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCELTIC ARTS …COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $130,750 · Housing & ShelterCOALFIELD D…THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $109,750 · EducationTHE UNIVE…EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $66,500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAppalachian Expeditions Inc: $38,200 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EnvironmentYEW MOUNTAIN CENTER: $6,000 · EnvironmentFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC: $45,000 · Civil Rights
Other$753,907Arts & Culture$142,350Housing & Shelter$130,750Education$109,750Recreation & Sports$76,500Environment$64,200Civil Rights$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $130,750 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTAMARACK FOUNDATION INC: $130,350 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $109,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $66,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC: $45,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $38,530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Expeditions Inc: $38,200 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYEW MOUNTAIN CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Laurel Learning Cooperative: $6,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TAMARACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Expeditions Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE TRACK INC ↗
  • Who funds CELTIC ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YEW MOUNTAIN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Laurel Learning Cooperative ↗
  • Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Claude Worthington Benedum FoundationPA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · The Burke & Herbert Bank Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John and Lucille Pianfetti Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John and Lucille Pianfetti Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Lucille Pianfetti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph