Loading…
· Private foundation
THE JOHN & ANN BARNEY FAMILY FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$169k
Granted FY2024
15
Grants
6
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Philanthropy$233kHuman Services$156kEmployment$48kEducation$15kYouth Development$10kReligion$9kHealth$7kCivil Rights$6kInternational$5kOther$213k
02FY2024 · 15 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CROSSROADS YMCA$50,000
- CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$39,000
- OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES$20,000
- SHELTERED 91 INC$20,000
- INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$8,500
- BLESSING CART$7,500
- VALPARAISO PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC$5,000
- DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION$5,000
- FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,500
- FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGS$2,000
- MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,000
- HEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC$2,000
- CRISIS CENTER INC$1,500
- FLORIDA FAIRTAX EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC$1,500
- NATIONAL MS SOCIETY INDIANA CHAPTER$1,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$603k · 20 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
20
8
Total granted
$603k
$68k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+63%
+98%
Still filing today
50%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $208k · revenue +155%
- CYCROSSROADS YMCA3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +81%
- OEOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- FHFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +2%
- SJST JOSEPH'S CARMELITE HOME FOR GIRLSone grant, 2021 · $10k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +205%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Central Indiana Corporate
The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…
Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of family medicine.
—
3
Cicp Foundation Inc
Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…
Community Improvement
4
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Health
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Health
6
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Health
7
Union Hospital Inc
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Health
8
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
Community Improvement
9
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Health
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Health
11
Southern Indiana Community Health Care
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles.
Health
12
Corus International Inc
This return should be reviewed together with corus international's related organizations lutheran world relief, inc., interchurch medical assistance inc., and corus solutions, inc. corus international's mission is to operate exclusively as…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartfire Missions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indiana University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$232,500Other$230,500Human Services$155,500Employment$48,000Education$14,500Youth Development$10,000Religion$9,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS YMCA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALPARAISO PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA ↗
- Who funds LAKE AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA FAIRTAX EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds HEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
John W Anderson FoundationIN24.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: John W Anderson Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Legacy Foundation Inc · Crown Point Community Foundation Inc · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · Dean & Barbara White · Fulk Family Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE JOHN & ANN BARNEY FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 310247014 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CROWN POINT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The John & Ann Barney Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The John & Ann Barney Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines