Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joan & Ron Collins Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$21kReligion$11kAnimals$9kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$7kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
13
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP WAPIYAPI$5,000
ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN$1,000
THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$777
ANSON CEMETERY INCORPORATED$600
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$500
CLARKE SCHOOL FOR HEARING$300
SALVATION ARMY$300
JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$300
FOSTER CLOSET$250
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$250
PARKISON'S FOUNDATION$250
THE CATTY SHACK$250
SAFE PET RESCUE$250
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$250
OPERATION SMILE$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE TENDER FOUNDATION: $150 → 13%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $100 → 8%FOSTER CLOSET: $250 → 14%FOSTER CLOSET: $300 → 14%FOSTER CLOSET: $300 → 14%FOSTER CLOSET: $250 → 14%FOSTER CLOSET: $200 → 14%FOSTER CLOSET: $200 → 14%Foster Closet: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 44 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
21

Total granted

$77k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

45%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +124%
  • JH
    JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • NK
    NATIONAL KIDENY FOUNDATION OF IL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PO
    PEACH OF HEART FARM
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • PO
    PEACE OF HEART COMMUNITY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $333 · revenue ×30

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
7
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
8
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
12
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hawke Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%11%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP WAPIYAPI — $21,120 · OtherCAMP WAPIYAPIORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN — $6,450 · OtherORPHAN GRAIN TRAINWESTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $4,350 · OtherWESTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHRonald McDonald House — $4,000 · OtherRonald McDonald HouseANSON CEMETERY INC — $3,700 · OtherANSON CEMETERY INCCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC — $3,311 · OtherCLARKE SCHOOL FOR HEARING — $2,800 · OtherNATIONAL KIDENY FOUNDATION OF IL — $2,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $2,350 · Other+41 more — $16,930 · Other+41 moreTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $5,385 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANI…JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,750 · AnimalsJACKSONVILLE…SAFE PET RESCUE INC — $970 · AnimalsSAFE PET RES…DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $400 · Animals+3 more — $450 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $800 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $550 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $450 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $250 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC — $100 · HealthTHE FOSTER CLOSET CORP — $1,600 · Human ServicesTENDER FOUNDATION INC — $150 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION — $112 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $100 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $700 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $450 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $400 · InternationalMercy Ships International — $350 · InternationalBEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $350 · Housing & ShelterPEACE OF HEART COMMUNITY INC — $333 · Housing & ShelterFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc — $450 · Youth Development
Other$67,511Animals$8,955Health$2,150Human Services$1,962International$1,900Housing & Shelter$683Youth Development$450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $5,385 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $1,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOSTER CLOSET CORP — $1,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE PET RESCUE INC — $970 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKE INC — $250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENDER FOUNDATION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $112 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTaylor University — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Pets Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEACHES SEA TURTLE PATROL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ST AUGUSTINE YOUTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE FOSTER CLOSET CORP
  • Who funds SAFE PET RESCUE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds PEACE OF HEART COMMUNITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joan & Ron Collins Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph