Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$225kRecreation & Sports$219kFood & Nutrition$40kAnimals$27kYouth Development$16kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$152k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIRAM COLLEGE$20,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION (CAF)$14,787
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR THE CARE OF INDIGENT ANIMALS (FCIA)$1,000
SAVINGS HORSES INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TIDES CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 9 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$316k
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+117%

Still filing today

22%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAF CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $156k
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $56k
  • VO
    VILLAGE OZ INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue -72% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • HC
    HIRAM COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • JI
    JUST IN TIME YOUTH SPONSORSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • CC
    CENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +119%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Silent Film Festival

SFSFF is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the presentation and preservation of silent cinema, and the education of the public about silent film as an art form and as a culturally valuable historical record.

Philanthropy
2
Friends of Santa Ana Zoo

The friends of santa ana zoo is a nonprofit corporation organized to develop financial support, growth, and community awareness for the santa ana zoo.

Animals
3
Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation

The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.

Animals
4
Fund for Santa Barbara Inc

Provide cash grants and free consulting to grassroots organizations in santa barbara county.

Philanthropy
5
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
6
Wildcare

WildCare supports people everywhere to live well with wildlife, through a full cycle of programs including wildlife advocacy and information resources, nature education programs, and medical aid for wild animals in need. Each year we treat…

—
7
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
8
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
9
Friends of the Urban Forest

Friends of the urban forest connects people with nature and each other by planting and caring for san francisco's trees and gardens.

Environment
10
California Film Institute

The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco First Tee

The first tee san francisco is a unique youth development programthat uses the sport of golf to teach students life skills. valuesinherent to the game of golf: including integrity, honesty,self-control and self-reliance are also explored…

Philanthropy
12
Fresh Approach

The mission of fresh approach is to create long-term change in local food systems by connecting california communities with healthy food from california farmers and expanding knowledge about food and nutrition.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tides Center; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the Care of Indigent Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIRAM COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherHIRAM COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCAF CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $155,829 · OtherCAF CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATIONCHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION (CAF): $56,287 · OtherCHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION (CAF)JUST IN TIME: $27,500 · OtherJUST IN TIME+16 more: $69,900 · Other+16 moreVILLAGE OZ INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionHIRAM COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 · PhilanthropySAVING HORSES INC: $3,000 · AnimalsFOUNDATION FOR THE CARE OF INDIGENT ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIONS JAZZ CONSERVATORY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTIDES CENTER: $1,545 · Human Services
Other$509,516Food & Nutrition$40,000Education$20,000Philanthropy$5,000Animals$4,000Arts & Culture$2,000Human Services$1,545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLAGE OZ INC: $40,000 over 3y, 69% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVING HORSES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $1,545 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CARE OF INDIGENT ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIONS JAZZ CONSERVATORY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA SHOWGROUNDS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLAGE OZ INC ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY CLUB OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAVING HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CARE OF INDIGENT ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS ↗
  • Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIONS JAZZ CONSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA SHOWGROUNDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joan and Joseph Fernandez Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph