Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
275
Grants FY2024still arriving
32
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$8.6MEnvironment$8.0MPhilanthropy$4.0MPublic Benefit$3.3MCivil Rights$3.0MEducation$2.7MCrime & Legal$2.2MCommunity Improvement$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 275 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k158 grants · $588k
  • $10k–50k61 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k54 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$6,000
Median grant
32
States reached
$144M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GONZALO FONSECA FOUNDATION$1,500,000
EUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION$250,000
NATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH NETWORK$150,000
BOULOUKI ITINERANT WORKSHOP FOR THE TRADITIONAL BUILDING TECHNIQUES$140,000
THE ACADEMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN IRAQ (TARII)$106,380
THE HOPEWELL FUND$100,000
BALKAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION$100,000
ALABAMA AFRICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS HERITAGE SITES CONSORTIUM$100,000
WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC$100,000
CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE$100,000
TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$100,000
AMERICA VOTES EDUCATION FUND$100,000
THE HOPEWELL FUND$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($36M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($4.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $703k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 17%LAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEE CENTER: $25k → 6%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $33k → 17%CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEE CENTER: $15k → 6%CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEE CENTER: $5k → 6%BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILD CARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER INC: $25k → 7%THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK: $55k → 13%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $5k → 10%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $5k → 10%ONE WARM COAT: $3k → 10%TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $5k → 23%THORN: $10k → 14%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $15k → 20%CENTER OF HELP INC: $5k → 6%CENTER OF HELP INC: $3k → 6%GREATER HUDSON PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $32k → 11%PFLAG NYC: $5k → 17%PFLAG NYC: $3k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT (ASAP): $52k → 17%SNACC INC: $46k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($4.2M)

13 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$1.8M · 11 grants
Greece$824k · 8 grants
Bulgaria$600k · 6 grants
Italy$360k · 5 grants
Germany$175k · 4 grants
Uruguay$160k · 3 grants
Lebanon$115k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$83k · 5 grants
Afghanistan$50k · 1 grant
Iraq$33k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 37% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 35%.

The Jm Kaplan Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 377 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

377 repeat relationships: 156 still active in FY2024, 221 since wound down; 102 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

377
366

Total granted

$28M
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+18%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    ENSEMBLE STUDIO THEATRE INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $950k · revenue +201%
  • American Forests
    5× · 2020–2024 · $545k · revenue +217%
  • LT
    LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $506k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • MV
    MOVEMENT VOTER FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +87%
  • URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $245k · revenue -28%
  • BC
    BROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY JUSTICE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
5
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
The Roosevelt Institute

To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.

Education
10
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Nonprofit Management Inc; the most unlike its peers is Banneker Douglas Museum Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

651 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 651 of the 866 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
157
Early backer (in before they grew)
640/651
Grantees still filing
432/651
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GONZALO FONSECA FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 · OtherGONZALO FONSECA FOUNDATIONEUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 · OtherEUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATIONBALKAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Other+105 more: $14,079,162 · Other+105 moreENSEMBLE STUDIO THEATRE INC: $950,000 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE STUD…Alabama African American Civil Rights Heritage Sites Consortium: $350,000 · Arts & CultureAlabama Afric…STORM KING ART CENTER: $222,500 · Arts & CultureSTORM KING AR…THE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $190,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $189,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC: $175,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $165,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $152,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MESOPOTAMIAN AREA STUDIES: $150,000 · Arts & CultureEQUIS INSTITUTE: $150,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $150,000 · Arts & Culture+14 more: $1,098,875 · Arts & Culture+14 moreAmerican Forests: $545,350 · EnvironmentAmerican Fore…LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $506,000 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST AL…OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $460,000 · EnvironmentOPEN SPACE IN…NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC: $400,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL AREAS…NEW VENTURE FUND: $345,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE F…BLUE FOREST FINANCE INC: $300,000 · EnvironmentBLUE FOREST F…URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK: $245,000 · EnvironmentURBAN SUSTAIN…STAND: $225,000 · EnvironmentSTANDScenic Hudson Inc: $195,000 · EnvironmentUnited States Endowment for Forestry: $150,000 · Environment+4 more: $311,375 · Environment+4 morePROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $350,000 · Civil RightsRight to Democracy Project: $325,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 · Civil RightsSTATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC: $200,000 · Civil RightsRespond Crisis Translation: $175,000 · Civil RightsNative Americans in Philanthropy: $150,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION: $150,000 · Civil RightsJOLT INITIATIVE: $134,887 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $125,000 · Civil RightsAmerica Votes Education Fund: $100,000 · Civil Rights+9 more: $583,705 · Civil RightsHOPEWELL FUND: $732,500 · PhilanthropyBIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $375,000 · PhilanthropyThe Pew Charitable Trusts: $342,500 · PhilanthropyTHE ALEX FUND INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $205,000 · PhilanthropyANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $200,000 · EducationWIKITONGUES INC: $175,000 · EducationFAIR FIGHT ACTION INC: $125,000 · EducationCONTINA IMPACT: $125,000 · EducationTHE BRYN MAWR SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BALTIMORE CITY INC: $113,500 · EducationHAYGROUND SCHOOL INC: $95,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $90,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE: $73,500 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $70,000 · EducationPENN PRAXIS INC: $60,000 · EducationScholarCHIPS Inc: $58,268 · EducationAppellate Project Inc: $50,000 · EducationORLEANS PUBLIC EDUCATION NETWORK: $50,000 · EducationELEANOR NOW: $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 · EducationWeird Enough Company Inc: $50,000 · EducationMOVEMENT VOTER FUND: $300,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ACTION INC: $175,000 · Community ImprovementFreedom Community Center: $175,000 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $150,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH MAIN STREET FUND: $75,000 · Community ImprovementPOWER INTERFAITH INC: $63,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY: $60,000 · Community ImprovementWORKER POWER INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$17,479,162Arts & Culture$3,942,375Environment$3,682,725Civil Rights$2,493,592Philanthropy$1,800,000Education$1,435,268Community Improvement$1,098,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENSEMBLE STUDIO THEATRE INC: $950,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $732,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Forests: $545,350 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $506,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $502,500 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $460,000 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $400,750 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetNATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC: $400,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US): $400,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetBIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $375,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAlabama African American Civil Rights Heritage Sites Consortium: $350,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $350,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $345,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pew Charitable Trusts: $342,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRight to Democracy Project: $325,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetESSENTIAL INFORMATION INC: $310,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $302,240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE FOREST FINANCE INC: $300,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetMOVEMENT VOTER FUND: $300,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES: $290,500 over 4y, 37% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $255,260 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetURBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK: $245,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSTAND: $225,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCouncil of American Overseas Research Centers: $225,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER: $222,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $210,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT GAUDENS MEMORIAL: $200,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSTATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $195,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $190,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC: $189,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetEVERY CAMPUS A REFUGE: $176,181 over 3y, 24% of budgetRespond Crisis Translation: $175,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetRURAL ACTION INC: $175,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWIKITONGUES INC: $175,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC: $175,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetIMMSCHOOLS: $175,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetFreedom Community Center: $175,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBLACK AND PINK INC: $175,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA VOICES FOR PEACE: $174,450 over 4y, 13% of budgetBlack Women Build - Baltimore Inc: $170,850 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $165,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $162,216 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetHELPING EDUCATE TO ADVANCE THE RIGHTS OF THE DEAF: $161,929 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetTHE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS: $156,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENSEMBLE STUDIO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Forests ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL AREAS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION (US) ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Alabama African American Civil Rights Heritage Sites Consortium ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
  • Who funds Right to Democracy Project ↗
  • Who funds ESSENTIAL INFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BLUE FOREST FINANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT VOTER FUND ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR MEDITERRANEAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds STAND ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Council of American Overseas Research Centers ↗
  • Who funds STORM KING ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT GAUDENS MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds STATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lily Auchincloss Foundation IncNY54.6× affinity31 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Hrbt Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · The Educational Foundation of America · The Ford Foundation · Ag Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Historic Annapolis Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Maryland Hall for the Creative Arts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 866 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jm Kaplan’s filings →

More from the funding graph