· Community foundation
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Prescott
To serve as a focal point for jewish planned giving and to enhance and promote the continuity of the jewish community through innovative and charitable programs, through philanthropy and development of humanitarian, social service, health, arts and cultural programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $420,468 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $436,747 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $16,279 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
- $250k+1 grant · $317k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHAT YOU DO MATTERS INSTITUTE | $317,413 |
| PURE IMAGINATION MUSIC FESTIVAL | $25,000 |
| YAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $20,297 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO | $15,000 |
| YAVAPAI COLLEGE PERFORMING ARTS | $13,758 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,000 |
| PRESCOTT AREA SHELTER SERVICES | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YCYAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +55%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA2× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue -34%
- COCHABAD OF PRESCOTT INC2× · 2017–2022 · $22k
Funded once
- WIWYDM INSTITUTE Todd Larsenone grant, 2022 · $84k
- PUPrescott Unified School Districtone grant, 2022 · $65k
- AIASCEND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +555%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
No cost legal services provided to vulnerable young people and trafficking survivors to help eliminate barriers to safety, stability, and opportunity. Specializing in family law, criminal history repair, vital document collection, and…
Agape Adoption Agency of Arizona, Inc is a Christian adoption and family service agency with services and programs which promote life, love, and healing.
Provide emotional and physical support to children who are or have been involved in the court appointed special advocate (casa) program in pima county, arizona.
Amarillo area casa advocates for abused and neglected children through support and training of court appointed volunteers
It is the mission of Arizona Faith and Families to recruit foster and adoptive parents from within the Christian church, to train and license them within a biblical world view, and to equip them to serve their Savior, home, church, and…
Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.
The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yavapai Casa for Kids Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ascend Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASCEND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Yavapai Community Hospital Association Dba Yavapai Regional Medical Center · United Way of Yavapai County Inc · Miter Charitable Foundation · Perry and Sandy Massie Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Prescott funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.