· Private foundation
The Jeremiah 924 Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $408k
- $250k+13 grants · $7.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $2,000,000 |
| CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,425,000 |
| HIGH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH | $810,000 |
| UNCAGED | $500,000 |
| FREEWAY MINISTRIES | $500,000 |
| RESOURCE HEALTH | $400,000 |
| WYCLIFFE | $363,627 |
| SPOKEN WORLDWIDE | $355,000 |
| PEACE PARTNERSHIP | $325,000 |
| JAMES RIVER CHURCH | $305,000 |
| VICTORY MISSION | $275,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS | $275,000 |
| GLOBAL FC | $250,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $120,000 |
| KINSMEN INITIATIVE | $83,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 48% of The Jeremiah 924 Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 46% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PEACE PARTNERSHIP INC7× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +109% · 56% of their budget
- UUNCAGED5× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +9% · 48% of their budget
- TGT4 Global Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +143%
Funded once
- TSTHE SEED FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -1%
- BIBIBLICA INCone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue 0%
- WBWINCHESTER BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Training pastors in third world countries
The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…
Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…
Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
This media outreach tool affords preachers and teachers of the Word in Christs Kingdom the global projection of media gospel. Our vision of Propagate Media Incorporation is to lift Jesus Christ higher for the world to see! But I, when I am…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation and the most unlike its peers is The Peace Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 24. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds THE PEACE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds UNCAGED ↗
- Who funds T4 Global Inc ↗
- Who funds PARAKALEO INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RACHEL HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds RADIUS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FREEWAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds The Orphanetwork ↗
- Who funds IPOURLIFE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds KINSMEN INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Care to Learn ↗
- Who funds Soar Detroit ↗
- Who funds THE RELEVATE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL FURTHERING FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds AGGRANDIZE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds SPOKEN GOSPEL INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY PREP SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · G II Charities · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Eden Bridge Foundation · Convoy of Hope · GiveClear Foundation · Greater Horizons
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jeremiah 924 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jeremiah 924 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Jeremiah 924 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.