Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jeff and Jennie Sidwell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$826kReligion$72kHuman Services$69kYouth Development$34kPhilanthropy$18kRecreation & Sports$6kEducation$5kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $202k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$387k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$202,000
GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$11,500
3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION$3,400
Individual grant recipient$3,155
CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS$1,500
GOFUNDME$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,070
Individual grant recipient$600
AVONDALE$359
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS: $2k → 10%4 Paws for Ability: $3k → 9%Conerstone of Hope: $5k → 17%Cornerstone of Hope: $5k → 17%Homeless Hands of Zanesville: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
IN
OH
CA
UT
WV
VA
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
41

Total granted

$1.0M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+7%

Still filing today

36%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +64%
  • CO
    CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +156%
  • TS
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CF
    Corder Family
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MC
    MUSKINGUM COUNTY JR FAIR HORSE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • 4P
    4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

2
Movember Foundation

Please refer to schedule o

Health
3
The Aneurysm Foundation

Taaf is dedicated to bettering the lives, support networks, and medical care of those affected by aneurysm and other types of vascular malformation of the brain. in support of that mission, we have three primary goals that guide the…

Health
4
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
5
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
6
Tatum Tough Foundation Inc

Our mission is to seek and assist families who are facing any kind of hardship. we want to help them financially, with service and encouragement, and with prayer, all the while instilling the strength and toughness that tatum embodied in…

Human Services
7
Cadasil Association

The mission of curecadasil is to raise awareness of cadasil, ensuring it will be universally recognized and understood by the medical community, enabling patients to be correctly diagnosed. we are dedicated to helping all touched by…

Health
8
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
The Zane Templin Foundation Inc

Suicide prevention for children, teens and young adults focusing on mental health

Health
11
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $810,000 · OtherGENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONGRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $61,000 · OtherGRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+42 more — $122,977 · Other+42 more3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH — $17,300 · Housing & ShelterMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,692 · PhilanthropyTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG — $1,500 · PhilanthropyMalouf Foundation — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $10,200 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesHOMELESS HANDS OF ZANEVILLE LLC — $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $9,200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $500 · HealthWOMENS SMALL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR — $1,500 · Community ImprovementZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC — $250 · Community ImprovementKEVIN MARTIN YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $600 · Recreation & SportsTri Valley Youth Baseball — $500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$993,977Housing & Shelter$17,300Philanthropy$16,692Human Services$15,200Health$9,700Community Improvement$1,750Recreation & Sports$1,100Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH — $17,300 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $10,692 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $10,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $9,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS SMALL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR — $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CARR CENTER INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOMELESS HANDS OF ZANEVILLE LLC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMalouf Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEVIN MARTIN YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $600 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds CHILDREN WITH HAIR LOSS INC
  • Who funds WOMENS SMALL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR
  • Who funds THE CARR CENTER INC
  • Who funds HOMELESS HANDS OF ZANEVILLE LLC
  • Who funds Malouf Foundation
  • Who funds KEVIN MARTIN YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J William & Mary Straker Charitable FdnOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J William & Mary Straker Charitable Fdn · Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jeff and Jennie Sidwell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph