Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$539k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Western North Carolina Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 29 organizations, $539k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

27
’20
27
’21
30
’22
30
’23
29
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$885kHousing & Shelter$443kHealth$324kEmployment$274kCommunity Improvement$262kYouth Development$180kHuman Services$158kEducation$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $408k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICROGRANTS$75,000
PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC$35,000
MAD DADS OF MINNEAPOLIS$30,000
FRIENDS OF THE GLOBAL MARKET$30,000
MAYO CLINIC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT$25,000
THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH$25,000
WOMEN VENTURE$25,000
SUMMIT ACADEMY$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
THE LIFT GARAGE$20,000
EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$20,000
URBAN VENTURES$20,000
URBAN HOMEWORKS$15,000
TWIN CITIES RISE$15,000
PARTNERSHIP RESOURCES INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $538k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PREPARE PROSPER: $8k → 14%PREPARE PROSPER: $8k → 14%PREPARE PROSPER: $8k → 14%PREPARE PROSPER: $8k → 14%Prepare Prosper: $8k → 14%Mad Dads of Minneapolis: $30k → 11%MAD DADS OF MINNEAPOLIS: $30k → 11%MAD DADS OF MINNEAPOLIS: $30k → 11%MAD DADS OF MINNEAPOLIS: $30k → 11%Neighborhood Development Center: $30k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $26k → 14%Breaking Free: $10k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $10k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $9k → 14%BREAKING FREE: $9k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 14%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $25k → 11%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $25k → 11%The Bridge for Youth: $25k → 11%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 11%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 11%Project for Pride in Living Inc: $35k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $35k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $35k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $30k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $30k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 41 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
8

Total granted

$2.3M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+31%

Still filing today

76%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $168k · revenue +19%
  • MD
    MAD DADS of Minneapolis
    4× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue +45%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAYO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GLOBAL MARKET INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -33%
  • MC
    MINNEAPOLIS CHAPTER OF MAD DADS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
4
Youthprise

Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.

Education
5
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

—
6
Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.

—
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
8
Build Wealth Mn Inc

Build Wealth MN's (BWMN) mission is to empower underserved communities and populations in the Twin Cities metro area to achieve social and economic wealth through community, economic, and housing development.

Education
9
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
10
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
11
Minnesota Valley Action Council Inc

Develop resources and opportunities which empower people and communities.

Community Improvement
12
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hired; the most unlike its peers is The Lift Garage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTE…MICROGRANTS: $385,000 · PhilanthropyMICROGRANTS+1 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyMayo Clinic Foundation: $100,000 · OtherMayo Clinic FoundationEmerge: $80,000 · OtherEmergeAmerican Red Cross: $61,000 · OtherAmerican Red CrossURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIO…FRIENDS OF THE GLOBAL MARKET: $60,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE GLOBAL MARKETPartnership Resources Inc: $55,000 · OtherPartnership Resources IncTree Trust: $55,000 · OtherTree TrustCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $50,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCENTRO GUADALUPANO: $50,000 · OtherHOUSING IN ACTION INC: $65,000 · OtherHOUSING IN ACTION INC+20 more: $262,000 · Other+20 morePROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $167,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN…MAD DADS of Minneapolis: $120,000 · Human ServicesMAD DADS of Minneapo…THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $115,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTHNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $57,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOP…Prepare and Prosper: $40,000 · Human ServicesPrepare and ProsperBreaking Free Inc: $38,000 · Human ServicesBreaking Free IncThe Lift Garage: $87,000 · EmploymentTwin Cities Rise: $75,000 · EmploymentHIRED: $40,000 · EmploymentACCESSABILITY INC: $17,000 · EmploymentMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $38,000 · HealthWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $18,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC: $13,000 · HealthAvow Foundation Inc: $7,000 · HealthSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC: $90,000 · EducationBolder Options: $38,000 · EducationOSIRIS ORGANIZATION: $15,000 · EducationWOMENVENTURE: $80,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF GLOBAL MARKET INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$889,000Other$948,000Human Services$537,500Employment$219,000Health$151,000Education$143,000Community Improvement$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMICROGRANTS: $385,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $167,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAD DADS of Minneapolis: $120,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $115,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Lift Garage: $87,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWOMENVENTURE: $80,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTwin Cities Rise: $75,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSING IN ACTION INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $57,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPartnership Resources Inc: $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTree Trust: $55,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIRED: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPrepare and Prosper: $40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBreaking Free Inc: $38,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBolder Options: $38,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF GLOBAL MARKET INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST DAVID'S CENTER: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACCESSABILITY INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTUDIO-180: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOSIRIS ORGANIZATION: $15,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOYCE UPTOWN FOODSHELF: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOUR SAVIOUR'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Partners with Youth: $7,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE ACADEMY FOR THE BLIND FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds MICROGRANTS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MAD DADS of Minneapolis ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC ↗
  • Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
  • Who funds WOMENVENTURE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Twin Cities Rise ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Partnership Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tree Trust ↗
  • Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds HIRED ↗
  • Who funds Prepare and Prosper ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds Breaking Free Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bolder Options ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GLOBAL MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO-180 ↗
  • Who funds OSIRIS ORGANIZATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN46× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Target Foundation · The James M Stanton Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Walser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jaye F and Betty F Dyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jaye F and Betty F Dyer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph