Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$279k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MRecreation & Sports$199kHuman Services$82kEducation$72kYouth Development$68kHousing & Shelter$32kScience & Tech$6kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$35,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$97,283
ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS MISSION & MINISTRY$60,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS$40,000
AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS$35,000
HEAR NASHVILLE$25,000
SURGERY CENTER OF CARMEL$17,000
MIRACLE FLIGHTS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $294k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE TUCKER'S HOUSE: $15k → 10%ABE'S YOUTH: $6k → 4%THE TUCKER'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%ABLE YOUTH: $5k → 4%SONGS FOR SOUND: $15k → 14%ABLE YOUTH: $3k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $35k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $35k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $25k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $25k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $25k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $25k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $25k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $23k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $23k → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
OK
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
21

Total granted

$1.4M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+49%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    Amputee Blade Runners
    7× · 2018–2024 · $195k · revenue +19%
  • HN
    HEAR NASHVILLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +58% · 33% of their budget
  • TH
    TUCKER'S HOUSE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATIONS OF ST THOMAS
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
  • OK
    OUR KIDS CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hearts for Hearing Foundation

Hearts for hearing advocates for, educates about, and innovatively provides comprehensive, life-changing hearing healthcare for all ages.

Human Services
2
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
3
The Achievable Foundation

Achievable health's mission is to provide high-quality healthcare to our community, with a specialty in treating individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

Human Services
4
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
5
Hear Your Song Inc

Hear Your Song empowers children and teens living with serious illnesses and complex health needs to make their voices heard through collaborative songwriting. At the heart of our work is a "kid-driven," totally individualized process that…

Health
6
Ut Le Bonheur Pediatric Specialists Inc

Ulps exists to support the missions of university of tennessee health science center and le bonheur children's hospital to provide high quality patient care, education, research and advocacy. ulps will collaborate with patients and their…

Health
7
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

The professional, scientific, and credentialing association for clinical and research based audiologists and speech-language pathologists. empowering and supporting speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and speech, language, and…

—
8
Foundation for Hearing Research Inc Weingarten Childrens Center

Transform lives of children who are deaf or hard of hearing, teaching them to listen, speak, and learnthrough proven spoken language and cognitive development curriculum, family centered education andinnovative technology.

Education
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
11
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
12
Hearing Health Foundation

Hearing health foundation's mission is to prevent and cure hearing loss and tinnitus through groundbreaking research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeshore Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hear Nashville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $150,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALSHRINER'S HOSPITALS: $120,000 · OtherSHRINER'S HOSPITALSSHRINERS HOSPITAS FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAS FOR CHILDRENIndividual grant recipient: $97,283 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $92,165 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASCENSION SAINT THOMAS MISSION & MINISTRY: $92,000 · OtherASCENSION SAINT THOMAS MISSION & MINISTRYTHE FOUNDATIONS OF ST THOMAS HEALTH: $80,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATIONS OF ST THOMAS HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $52,120 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $41,500 · Other+22 more: $364,299 · Other+22 moreAmputee Blade Runners: $195,000 · Human ServicesAmputee Blade Runne…TUCKER'S HOUSE: $45,034 · Human ServicesTUCKER'S HOUSEALIVE HOSPICE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPICE INCSongs for Sound Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesAble Youth Inc: $13,539 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEAR NASHVILLE: $180,000 · HealthHEAR NASHVIL…SPECIAL KIDS INC: $17,916 · HealthSPECIAL KIDS…+2 more: $4,795 · HealthVanderbilt University: $43,870 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $17,085 · EducationABE'S GARDEN: $32,010 · Housing & ShelterAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,189,367Human Services$318,573Health$202,711Education$60,955Housing & Shelter$32,010Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmputee Blade Runners: $195,000 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetHEAR NASHVILLE: $180,000 over 8y, 33% of budgetTUCKER'S HOUSE: $45,034 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $43,870 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABE'S GARDEN: $32,010 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE FLIGHTS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOUR KIDS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBRIDGES FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC: $17,916 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $17,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSongs for Sound Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetAble Youth Inc: $13,539 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHope for Justice Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAKESHORE FOUNDATION: $3,795 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLE UP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
  • Who funds HEAR NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds TUCKER'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds ABE'S GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE FLIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds OUR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Songs for Sound Inc ↗
  • Who funds Able Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN21.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Dugas Family Foundation II Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Ransom Charitable Trust · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James W Pickle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph