Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James W Gettelfinger Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$369kEducation$256kYouth Development$251kPhilanthropy$67kHuman Services$28kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE GREATER CINCINNATI$50,000
DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE$50,000
NEWPORT CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
CATHOLIC INNER CITY SCHOOLS FUND$24,000
LINDEN GROVE SCHOOL$10,000
WILLIAM T COAKLEY FOUNDATION$5,000
ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
PREGNANCY CENTER EAST$3,000
SAINT MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SAINT STEPHEN CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
COVENANT HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%ST MARGARET HALL: $3k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $3k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $15k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $3k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $3k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
IA
OH
CA
KY
AZ
TN
MS
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$894k · 10 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$894k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+98%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +12%
  • II
    ISPACE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $42k · revenue +14%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TD
    TOTAL DONATIONS TO RECIPIENTS WHO RECEIVED 1000 OR LESS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • UW
    United Way of Greater Cincinnati
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -2%
  • NC
    NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
2
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
3
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
4
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
5
Good Counsel Inc

Good counsel, inc. is a not-for-profit organization rooted in the first principles of catholic morality concerning the dignity of every human person. good counsel recognizes the dignity of god-given life from the moment of conception,…

Human Services
6
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
10
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
11
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
12
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy House Living Centers; the most unlike its peers is The Melbourne & Michael Folkes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC INNER CITY SCHOOLS FUND: $163,524 · OtherCATHOLIC INNER CITY SCHOOLS FUNDHOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI: $150,500 · OtherHOPE IGNITES CINCINNATIBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE CINCINNATI: $100,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE CINCINNATIWILLIAM T COAKLEY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherWILLIAM T COAKLEY FOUNDATIONNEWPORT CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherTOTAL DONATIONS TO RECIPIENTS WHO RECEIVED 1000 OR LESS: $19,750 · Other+10 more: $54,000 · Other+10 moreTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $350,000 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE+2 more: $4,500 · ReligionISPACE INC: $42,000 · Arts & CulturePREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesST MARGARET HALL: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $11,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MELBOURNE & MICHAEL FOLKES FOUNDATION: $1,500 · PhilanthropyLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationROYALMONT ACADEMY INC: $500 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 · HealthMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$547,774Religion$354,500Arts & Culture$42,000Human Services$29,000Philanthropy$12,500Education$10,500Health$3,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $350,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI: $150,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetISPACE INC: $42,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST MARGARET HALL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY COMMUNICATIONS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MELBOURNE & MICHAEL FOLKES FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROYALMONT ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds ISPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds LINDEN GROVE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET HALL ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY COMMUNICATIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE MELBOURNE & MICHAEL FOLKES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds ROYALMONT ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James W Gettelfinger Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James W Gettelfinger Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James W Gettelfinger Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The James W Gettelfinger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James W Gettelfinger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph